2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-022-02270-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Main drivers of drainage pattern development in onshore Makran Accretionary Wedge, SE Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hillslope angle is a metric dependent on the DEM scale and quality (Figure S1b in Supporting Information S1). In this context, a normalized metric of channel steepness ( k sn ) is also helpful for demonstrating either temporal or progressive changes in rock uplift or climate, and due to its positive empirical correlation with erosion rates, it is widely used in tectonic geomorphology (e.g., Adams et al., 2020; Forte et al., 2015; Haghipour & Burg, 2014; Kaveh‐Firouz et al., 2023; Kirby & Whipple, 2012; Mandal et al., 2015; Scherler et al., 2014; Wobus et al., 2006). This metric uses a reference concavity index ( θ ref = m / n ) to normalize the local channel slope ( S ) to the upstream drainage area ( A ) and is based on the Equation 1 (Flint, 1974; Kirby & Whipple, 2012): knormalsnormaln=Aθnormalrnormalenormalf0.25emS ${k}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{n}}={A}^{\theta \mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}}\,S$ …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hillslope angle is a metric dependent on the DEM scale and quality (Figure S1b in Supporting Information S1). In this context, a normalized metric of channel steepness ( k sn ) is also helpful for demonstrating either temporal or progressive changes in rock uplift or climate, and due to its positive empirical correlation with erosion rates, it is widely used in tectonic geomorphology (e.g., Adams et al., 2020; Forte et al., 2015; Haghipour & Burg, 2014; Kaveh‐Firouz et al., 2023; Kirby & Whipple, 2012; Mandal et al., 2015; Scherler et al., 2014; Wobus et al., 2006). This metric uses a reference concavity index ( θ ref = m / n ) to normalize the local channel slope ( S ) to the upstream drainage area ( A ) and is based on the Equation 1 (Flint, 1974; Kirby & Whipple, 2012): knormalsnormaln=Aθnormalrnormalenormalf0.25emS ${k}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{n}}={A}^{\theta \mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}}\,S$ …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to lower (east) catchments, as evidenced by higher uplift rates in the upper and middle parts than in the lower part (<0.5 mm/year; Saber et al, 2020). The course of the QOR in the eastern plateau margin follows the orientation of major structures (Figure 3c) as evidenced by its trellis pattern (Figure 7a), which is the case in several active zones, that is, Zagros, and Makran (e.g., Kaveh-Firouz et al, 2023b;Rangzan & Iqbaluddin, 1995). The ungraded shape of QOR profile is consistent with a geological structure in the middle part.…”
Section: Chi Maps and Plotsmentioning
confidence: 85%