2015
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mainland size variation informs predictive models of exceptional insular body size change in rodents

Abstract: The tendency for island populations of mammalian taxa to diverge in body size from their mainland counterparts consistently in particular directions is both impressive for its regularity and, especially among rodents, troublesome for its exceptions. However, previous studies have largely ignored mainland body size variation, treating size differences of any magnitude as equally noteworthy. Here, we use distributions of mainland population body sizes to identify island populations as 'extremely' big or small, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
22
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The island rule, like Bergmann's rule, may prove to be taxon‐specific in mammals (Meiri et al., ), with species within a given order typically following a common pattern. For example, rodent species, with some exceptions, typically evolve larger body size on islands (Durst & Roth, ), and patterns found among primates support the island rule as well (Bromham & Cardillo, ; Welch, ). In contrast, the apparent lack of support for the island rule in the common treeshrew may prove to be the common pattern throughout Scandentia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The island rule, like Bergmann's rule, may prove to be taxon‐specific in mammals (Meiri et al., ), with species within a given order typically following a common pattern. For example, rodent species, with some exceptions, typically evolve larger body size on islands (Durst & Roth, ), and patterns found among primates support the island rule as well (Bromham & Cardillo, ; Welch, ). In contrast, the apparent lack of support for the island rule in the common treeshrew may prove to be the common pattern throughout Scandentia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The principal product of RTA is a recursively branching tree that describes the direct, interactive and contextual relationships between the response variable (here Si) and a subset of the predictor variables (geographic and ecological variables) (see e.g. Durst & Roth, , ; Lomolino et al., , ; Lyons et al., ; Van der Geer et al., for descriptions and application of classification and regression tree analyses to body size patterns). For each RTA, I obtained an optimal tree, selected based on K‐fold cross‐validation, and a maximal tree, produced by growing interactively the respective optimal tree as large as possible (SAS Institute, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, although the majority of island bovids, as large mammals, do follow the main prediction of the island rule, showing a body size reduction (Figure 1), the island rule pattern is not clearly exhibited across all species/subspecies of insular bovids combined (Figure 1). Much variation about the analysed island rule trends (r 2 values ranging from about .03 to .60; see Table 2) is, however, to be expected given the variation among islands in terms of characteristics proposed to influence evolution of body size of insular mammals (in particular, predatory and competitive release; Durst & Roth, 2015;Lomolino et al, 2012). Furthermore, it is worth noting the presence on different islands (e.g.…”
Section: Generality Of the Island Rule In Bovidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In many rodent species, island populations differ significantly in size from mainland relatives and populations without predators (Goldwater et al 2012;Durst & Roth 2015) and this trend has been documented in New Zealand mice (Russell 2012). Each mouse in our sample was weighed (balance accurate to 0.01 g), and, because each population sample contained mice of different ages, we analysed morphological variation using an ANOVA-like Generalized Linear Model (GLM) fitted using the linear model (lm) function in the R statistical program, version 3.0.1.…”
Section: Morphological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%