2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mainstreaming climate change adaptation into the European Union’s development assistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, development activities globally are recognized as being in need of 'climate proofing' to ensure they are sustainable, while also strengthening resilience to climate change in vulnerable countries (e.g. De Roeck et al, 2018). Temporary labour mobility schemes should be no exception to climate mainstreaming, yet it has been noted that those schemes in Australia (and New Zealand) do not currently recognize the importance of climate change adaptation, or set climate change adaptation as a component of their goals (Gromilova, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, development activities globally are recognized as being in need of 'climate proofing' to ensure they are sustainable, while also strengthening resilience to climate change in vulnerable countries (e.g. De Roeck et al, 2018). Temporary labour mobility schemes should be no exception to climate mainstreaming, yet it has been noted that those schemes in Australia (and New Zealand) do not currently recognize the importance of climate change adaptation, or set climate change adaptation as a component of their goals (Gromilova, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this mainstreaming had already occurred, adaptation aid distribution should be related, at least in part, to the climate-sensitive of countries’ health sectors. For project run by the EU itself, this mainstreaming process has already started [80], which also seems to be the case for Sweden and the UK if we believe practitioners working in these countries [29,30]. Yet, as this study shows, so far climate-sensitivity—at least of the health sector—does not play a role for how adaptation aid is allocated in a sample considering all donor-recipient pairs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Thus, the mainstreaming of adaptation aid, i.e., the integration of adaptation and development, does not yet seem to have occurred. Although others find that mainstreaming does occur for development projects run directly by the EU [80], the same does not seem to be the case at the level of the individual donors, and thus for bilateral adaptation aid. This does not mean, however, that individual donors, such as for example Sweden or the UK, are not following the lead of the EU in mainstreaming climate adaptation project, but in the cross-section of 28 donor countries mainstreaming of adaptation aid cannot be detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the design of research protocols for manual content analysis often relies on the a priori determination of conceptual categories, which is challenging given the mutable and contested nature of key concepts in adaptation governance (Head, ; Levin, Cashore, Bernstein, & Auld, ; Pollitt, ), the fuzziness of adaptation as a distinct problem from issues like risk management (Bauer & Steurer, ; Dabrowski, ; Hetz, ; Uittenbroek, Janssen‐Jansen, & Runhaar, ; Viguié & Hallegatte, ; Wamsler & Pauleit, ), and differences in the understanding and use of these concepts across places and sectors (Dupuis & Knoepfel, ; Keenan, King, & Willis, ). While identification and classification of adaptation in stand‐alone climate policies is relatively straightforward, identifying adaptation‐relevant policies from related domains such as water management or sustainable development is a key limitation in current content analysis approaches (Dupuis & Knoepfel, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%