2017
DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maintaining and repeating tocolysis: A reflection on evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prematurity is associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates; therefore, it seems obvious that prolongation of the pregnancy should improve the outcome. However, there are only a few studies which demonstrate that maintenance tocolysis improves maternal and neonatal (long-term) outcomes and does not merely prolong pregnancy 12 , 18 , 19 . Short-term tocolysis should be given for 48 h to allow the administration of antenatal corticosteroids to improve the neonatal outcome 20 , and it is often recommended that maintenance tocolysis should be avoided 8 , 21 , 22 , 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prematurity is associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates; therefore, it seems obvious that prolongation of the pregnancy should improve the outcome. However, there are only a few studies which demonstrate that maintenance tocolysis improves maternal and neonatal (long-term) outcomes and does not merely prolong pregnancy 12 , 18 , 19 . Short-term tocolysis should be given for 48 h to allow the administration of antenatal corticosteroids to improve the neonatal outcome 20 , and it is often recommended that maintenance tocolysis should be avoided 8 , 21 , 22 , 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeated or prolonged tocolysis is controversial; it is not recommended in most guidelines or not even mentioned. In some cases, maintenance tocolysis could be indicated to allow the fetus to achieve a higher gestational age 12 . The German S2k-guideline does not recommend long-term tocolysis as it does not significantly reduce the preterm birth rate or fetal morbidity and mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most acceptable strategy is acute tocolysis or 48 h of tocolytic agent use for steroid and magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) administration, as well as to gain time for maternal–fetal transfer [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. As of now, it is still uncertain whether the maintenance and repeating of tocolysis will improve neonatal outcomes [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Indeed, a systematic review analyzing 16 different international guidelines, including those from the WHO, the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG), the United States of America (USA), Canada, the United Kingdom (UK), Belgium, France, Japan, China, Australia, and New Zealand, etc., showed that most guidelines agreed on acute tocolysis for threatened preterm labor and recommended against long-term tocolysis [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preterm labor is the major cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity in high-income countries and constitutes a huge economic burden on the healthcare system ( Blencowe et al, 2013 ). Administration of tocolytics can reduce the intensity and frequency of uterine contractions to prolong pregnancy, thereby providing time for further intrauterine maturation and interventions that may improve infant outcome ( Dehaene et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%