2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maintaining contact with bucks does not induce refractoriness to the male effect in seasonally anestrous female goats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
27
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
27
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The sexual behavior of the males was assessed by flehmen, ano-genital sniffing, nudging, mounting attempts and mounts. The sexual activity of the treated bucks used in the present study was significantly higher than that of control males and has been reported elsewhere [8,9]. All females were maintained under extensive management conditions prior to the study.…”
Section: Animalssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The sexual behavior of the males was assessed by flehmen, ano-genital sniffing, nudging, mounting attempts and mounts. The sexual activity of the treated bucks used in the present study was significantly higher than that of control males and has been reported elsewhere [8,9]. All females were maintained under extensive management conditions prior to the study.…”
Section: Animalssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…All males were submitted to a photoperiodic treatment of 2.5 months of long days (16 h of light/8 h of darkness). This treatment has previously been shown to stimulate testosterone secretion and to improve sexual activity of bucks during the non-breeding season [7,9]. The sexual behavior of the males was assessed by flehmen, ano-genital sniffing, nudging, mounting attempts and mounts.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A combination of photoperiod and male effect has been proposed to regulate goat reproductive seasonality (Delgadillo et al 2003(Delgadillo et al , 2004(Delgadillo et al , 2006. In fact, sexually active males exposed to prepuberal (Amoah and Bryant 1984;Mellado et al 2000) and adult females goats synchronised reproductive activity under either lactational or seasonal anestrous (Ve´liz et al 2002(Ve´liz et al , 2006a(Ve´liz et al , 2006bPellicer-Rubio et al 2007). A high proportion of goats exposed to a sexually active male showed estrus behaviour 2 or 3 days after joining with the buck (Chemineau 1983(Chemineau , 1987 and ovulated in response to a male by increases in both GnRH and LH secretion (Chemineau et al 1986a(Chemineau et al , 1986b(Chemineau et al , 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent reports have demonstrated that even physical isolation is dispensable for male effect in sheep and goats. 4,9 Moreover, most reports have evaluated the effects of the male effect on ovulation, 4 but pregnancy rates have not been described in most reports. Since recent discoveries on male effect have not been transferred to commercial breeding practices in small ruminants, a critical aspect of the procedure was revisited here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%