2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04733-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maintaining ecosystem resilience: functional responses of tree cavity nesters to logging in temperate forests of the Americas

Abstract: Logging often reduces taxonomic diversity in forest communities, but little is known about how this biodiversity loss affects the resilience of ecosystem functions. We examined how partial logging and clearcutting of temperate forests influenced functional diversity of birds that nest in tree cavities. We used point-counts in a before-after-control-impact design to examine the effects of logging on the value, range, and density of functional traits in bird communities in Canada (21 species) and Chile (16 speci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
44
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These strongly impact the long-term survival, regeneration, and diversity of forest-dwelling organism groups [3,4]. Silvicultural treatments can directly generate changes in forest biodiversity by deteriorating communities associated with individual trees and tree-related microhabitats, such as epiphytes [5], deadwood-dependent communities [6], and cavity nesters [7]. Most of the forest-dependent taxa are via artificial gaps or group selection, therefore, gap-cutting was also part of our study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These strongly impact the long-term survival, regeneration, and diversity of forest-dwelling organism groups [3,4]. Silvicultural treatments can directly generate changes in forest biodiversity by deteriorating communities associated with individual trees and tree-related microhabitats, such as epiphytes [5], deadwood-dependent communities [6], and cavity nesters [7]. Most of the forest-dependent taxa are via artificial gaps or group selection, therefore, gap-cutting was also part of our study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This outcome may be attributed to either the creation of new successional niches in the landscape or the understory vegetation and associated communities demonstrating greater resiliency than overstory communities (Andersen et al 2009). The response of bird taxonomic richness was maintained under a logging operation, but their functional richness and diversity were reduced (Ibarra et al 2017). The results of the latter study show that the disturbance paradox may play out following forest management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The response of bird taxonomic richness was maintained under a logging operation, but their functional richness and diversity were reduced (Ibarra et al. ). The results of the latter study show that the disturbance paradox may play out following forest management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Ibarra et al. ). For example, following the current policy of minimum diameter cutting limits in our study system in Argentina, harvesting one‐half of the basal area of trees resulted in nine times fewer cavities and 17 times fewer nests (Cockle et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Long-lasting cavities occur primarily in large, living trees, often in slow-growing old-growth species, but also in some faster-growing early successional species such as trembling aspen (Lindenmayer and Wood 2010, Wesołowski 2011, 2012, Edworthy et al 2012. Harvesting large living trees (e.g., through minimum diameter cutting limits) has led to disproportionate reductions in cavity availability, as well as the abundance, taxonomic and functional diversity of cavity nesters (Politi et al 2012, Ruggera et al 2016, Ibarra et al 2017. For example, following the current policy of minimum diameter cutting limits in our study system in Argentina, harvesting one-half of the basal area of trees resulted in nine times fewer cavities and 17 times fewer nests (Cockle et al 2010).…”
Section: Conserving High-and Low-productivity Cavities In the Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%