2022
DOI: 10.3390/su142315597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maintaining Quality of Life during the Pandemic: Managing Economic, Social, and Health Well-Being Amid the COVID-19 Crisis of Agricultural Entrepreneurs

Abstract: Every sphere of life is being impacted by COVID-19, but little is known about how the pandemic is affecting agricultural entrepreneurs’ quality of life in developing nations. Therefore, this study examined how COVID-19 affected agricultural entrepreneurs’ quality of life by utilizing the data collected from 220 females and 1501 males through multistage purposive and random sampling methods. The dataset was analyzed using ordered logistic regression and principal component analysis. The study results indicated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the future directions of EdTech research in order to promote digital agriculturalists' learning competencies [1,[23][24][25][26], it will still be challenging to integrate strategies (e.g., pedagogy, andragogy, heutagogy, and cybergogy) with emerging technology to help agriculturalists gain access to learning and gain an appropriate learning process that affects productivity and improves the quality of life and well-being.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future directions of EdTech research in order to promote digital agriculturalists' learning competencies [1,[23][24][25][26], it will still be challenging to integrate strategies (e.g., pedagogy, andragogy, heutagogy, and cybergogy) with emerging technology to help agriculturalists gain access to learning and gain an appropriate learning process that affects productivity and improves the quality of life and well-being.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%