2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2005
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2005.1545275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maintaining visibility of a moving holonomic target at a fixed distance with a non-holonomic robot

Abstract: In this paper we consider the problem of maintaining surveillance of a moving the target by a nonholonomic mobile observer. The observer's goal is to maintain visibility of the target from a predefined, fixed distance, l. The target escapes if (a) it moves behind an obstacle to occlude the observer's view, (b) it causes the observer to collide with an obstacle, or (c) it exploits the nonholonomic constraints on the observer motion to increase its distance from the observer beyond the surveillance distance l.We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Substituting the expressions above into (18) and after some algebra one can verify that the analytical expression for the worst case safe turning radius R F w = R F c r is given by (17). 5 It follows that if L moves into cell i + 1 with turning radius R L ≥ r d 2 + R F w 2 , then the trajectories of F in cells i and i + 1 are collision-free.…”
Section: A Motion Coordination In a Corridor Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Substituting the expressions above into (18) and after some algebra one can verify that the analytical expression for the worst case safe turning radius R F w = R F c r is given by (17). 5 It follows that if L moves into cell i + 1 with turning radius R L ≥ r d 2 + R F w 2 , then the trajectories of F in cells i and i + 1 are collision-free.…”
Section: A Motion Coordination In a Corridor Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter specification is the main difference of this current paper compared with other papers on maintaining visibility problems involving robots with field-of-view constraints [10]- [16]. Finally, compared with [18] and [20], here F is not required to have full access on the state vector of L.…”
Section: B Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a decision problem which corresponds to answering the question: can the target escape the observer's view? Murrieta-Cid et al defined this problem and considered to maintain surveillance of a moving target by a non-holonomic mobile observer (Murrieta-Cid et al 2005). The observer's goal is to maintain visibility of the target from a predefined, fixed distance.…”
Section: Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintaining the target in the field of view of the robot's sensory system is another widely discussed topic, 16,[25][26][27][28][29][30] especially in surveillance applications. Different types of sensors are used by the robot, mainly the vision sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%