2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.04.281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maintenance of Environmental Services Cleaning and Disinfection in the ICU After a Performance Improvement Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies have evaluated the sustainability of such systematic improvements. One study showed that cleaning performance measured by the removal of a fluorescent marker increased from a baseline of 52% to 80%-85% through training and monthly feedback [68]. However, compliance soon returned toward baseline (57%-66%) when the monthly feedback ceased.…”
Section: Limitations Of Conventional Cleaning and Disinfectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies have evaluated the sustainability of such systematic improvements. One study showed that cleaning performance measured by the removal of a fluorescent marker increased from a baseline of 52% to 80%-85% through training and monthly feedback [68]. However, compliance soon returned toward baseline (57%-66%) when the monthly feedback ceased.…”
Section: Limitations Of Conventional Cleaning and Disinfectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a concern that these interventions might lose impact over time, since cleaning is physically demanding, poorly paid, and subject to inadequate staffing (17,265). Furthermore, there tends to be rapid turnover among janitorial and housekeeping staff, and this may be related to higher sickness levels as well as dissatisfaction with pay, status, and conditions (17).…”
Section: Observation Supervision and Education Of Housekeeping Staffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assertion is evidenced by a report in which environmental services (EVS) staff improved their cleaning performance from 52% to 83% after implementing fluorescent marker monitoring but regressed toward the baseline (57%) after monthly feedback ceased. 6 Current methods for quality control monitoring are retrospective and often are only intermittently performed; thus, it may be challenging to translate to timely feedback for EVS staff. To sustain a high level of cleaning compliance, a unique approach is needed, one that provides direct and immediate feedback to workers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emergency department (ED) ILI data were obtained using the North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool (NC DETECT), a statewide syndromic surveillance system. 6 Collective decisions were made to establish parameters for influenza season, which were then communicated through internal and external communication pathways.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%