1991
DOI: 10.1097/00043426-199122000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maintenance of the Patency of Indwelling Central Venous Catheters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
1
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
68
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our series 0.38 per 1000 catheters required removal because of occlusion and similar rates have been reported whether or not routine catheter flushing is performed [35]. Alternative to heparinised saline for flushing are saline 0.9'% [36] and disodium EDTA. (20 mF.nil ' ) [37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In our series 0.38 per 1000 catheters required removal because of occlusion and similar rates have been reported whether or not routine catheter flushing is performed [35]. Alternative to heparinised saline for flushing are saline 0.9'% [36] and disodium EDTA. (20 mF.nil ' ) [37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…We contacted three individual study authors for further study details and were able to find further information for two studies (Goossens et al, 2013, Smith et al, 1991. Of the 10 studies, three met the inclusion criteria (Cesaro et al, 2009, Goossens et al, 2013, Smith et al, 1991 and were included in this review. Details of data extraction are summarised in Table 1.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants had a long-term central venous catheter placed, and were undergoing treatment for haematology or oncology conditions. Participants in Cesaro et al, (2009) andSmith et al, (1991) had Broviac tunnelled CVCs inserted, whereas all participants in Goossens et al, (2013) had totally inserted catheters (ports) placed. All studies were undertaken in developed nations in tertiary referral centres.…”
Section: Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…52 However, a prospective study that evaluated twice weekly heparin flushes versus weekly saline flushes in 203 children with Broviac-Hickman CVCs demonstrated an increased rate of catheter occlusions (83% vs. 41%, P=0.0002) and catheter infections (65% vs. 44%, P=0.01) with saline flushes. 53 Although most guidelines for subcutaneous ports recommend monthly flushes when not in use, two studies have demonstrated that increased periods of time between flushes, from six weeks to three months, may not increase the frequency of complications.…”
Section: Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%