Maintenance requirements and marginal bone loss associated with implant-retained overdentures: a retrospective cohort study

TAKİ, Sadık; Mumcu, Emre

doi:10.1007/s00784-022-04437-6

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Different studies reported data on the marginal bone loss of the longterm outcome of implants supporting a mandibular overdenture [6,24,36,37]. The factors that jeopardize these clinical outcomes include smoking, history of periodontitis, bone quantity, and an increased follow-up period [6,[33][34][35]. In the present study, the mean marginal bone loss was 1.12 ± 0.34 mm.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 45%

“…The maintenance requirements and the presence of prosthetic complications associated with the implant-retained overdenture must be evaluated [35,50,51]. Mechanical complications were frequent in the present study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 85%

“…The evaluation of the marginal bone loss is an important standard for implant success [3,6,24,[35][36][37]. Different studies reported data on the marginal bone loss of the longterm outcome of implants supporting a mandibular overdenture [6,24,36,37].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The matrix resiliency among different attachment systems can be compromised by the insertion and removal of the overdenture [12,34]. The retention loss, related to the wear of the retention device, is in common need of maintenance, requiring activation or replacement that can be easily provided by the clinician in clinical practice [35,50]. This event affects all patients, and it can occur several times during the follow-up.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Early Loading of Two Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures in Geriatric Edentulous Patients: A 12-Year Follow-Up Study

Ortega

Matos‐Garrido

Jiménez-Guerra

et al. 2023

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This study aims to show the clinical outcomes of implants supporting mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients. Methods: Mandibular edentulous patients were diagnosed with an oral examination, panoramic radiograph, and diagnostic casts for intermaxillary relations and treated with overdentures over two implants. After two-stage surgery, implants were early loaded with an overdenture at 6 weeks. Results: Fifty-four patients (28 females and 24 males) were treated with 108 implants. Thirty-two patients (59.2%) had a previous history of periodontitis. Twenty-three patients (46%) were smokers. Forty patients (74.1%) suffered from systemic diseases (i.e., diabetes, cardiovascular diseases). The clinical follow-up of the study was 147.8 ± 10.4 months. The clinical outcomes showed a global success of 94.5% of implants. Fifty-four overdentures were placed in the patients over the implants. The mean marginal bone loss was 1.12 ± 0.34 mm. Nineteen patients (35.2%) showed some kind of mechanical prosthodontic complication. Sixteen implants (14.8%) were associated with peri-implantitis. Conclusions: Based on the clinical results obtained, we can determine that the treatment of elderly edentulous patients with mandibular overdentures through the early loading of two placed implants is a successful implant protocol.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 45%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 85%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Early Loading of Two Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures in Geriatric Edentulous Patients: A 12-Year Follow-Up Study

Ortega

Matos‐Garrido

Jiménez-Guerra

et al. 2023

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…41.42,43 Assessing the degree of marginal bone loss is an important criterion for implant success. 44.Various studies have presented data on marginal bone loss associated with long-term results of implantsupported mandibular prostheses. Factors that influence these clinical outcomes include smoking, history of periodontitis, bone mass, and length of follow-up.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Radiographic evaluation of alveolar bone height changes around mandibular implants with different surface treatments supporting mandibular overdenture (A split mouth comparative study )

Elkady,

shaker

2024

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate bone changes around micro textured acid-washed surface implants and sandblasted and acid-etched surface-treated implants in the mandible of fully edentulous patients. Materials and methods:Assessment of marginal bone loss around the implant was performed using cone beam radiography. Bone resorption was measured as the distance between the implantabutment connection and the first implant-bone contact. Implant dimensions, width and length, were used for software calibration to compensate for radiographic magnification. The two installed implants were early-loaded. Marginal bone loss was evaluated during the early loading period after 6w ad 3m months by subtracting bone level values in millimeters of buccal and lingual aspects of each implant from values at base line and averaged .Results : As a result of these studies, there is no statistically significant difference in bone loss for Implant I (microtextured, acid-washed implant surface treatment) compared to Implant II (Neodent Aqua, sandblasted acid-washed implant surface treatment) However, it was shown statistically that there was a significant difference between the two assessment of bone loss between two periods of 6 W and 3 M. Conclusion:Based on this discussion, it can be concluded that both implants with different surface treatments have a desirable effect on the alveolar bone surrounding both mandibular implants.

show abstract

Is the implant-retained overdenture a solution to improve the patient quality of life?

Mourão

Han

2022

Evid Based Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Maintenance requirements and marginal bone loss associated with implant-retained overdentures: a retrospective cohort study

Cited by 3 publications

References 28 publications

Early Loading of Two Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures in Geriatric Edentulous Patients: A 12-Year Follow-Up Study

Early Loading of Two Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures in Geriatric Edentulous Patients: A 12-Year Follow-Up Study

Radiographic evaluation of alveolar bone height changes around mandibular implants with different surface treatments supporting mandibular overdenture (A split mouth comparative study )

Is the implant-retained overdenture a solution to improve the patient quality of life?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About