Eradication of HCV in patients with advanced liver fibrosis or cirrhosis reduces, but does not altogether abolish, the risk of development of hepatocellular carcinoma. The reasons underlying this residual risk remain elusive. Even if HCV clearance eliminates its direct and indirect carcinogenic effects, the persistence of cirrhosis and the possible coexistence of metabolic factors (diabetes, obesity and insulin resistance) and of alcohol abuse can promote the development of hepatocellular carcinoma acting as autonomous, nonviral carcinogenic factors. Lessons learned in the IFN era may still assist in predicting the forthcoming scenario, when IFN-free regimens will obtain high rates of viral clearance even at the most advanced stages of liver disease.
KeywordsHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a challenging malignancy of global importance, being the second cause of cancer-related death worldwide [1]. The majority of HCCs occur in the context of chronic infection with HBV and HCV, and the cancer risk is directly related to the histological and clinical stage of the underlying liver disease [2]. In particular, HCV infection stands today as the leading risk factor for HCC in many industrialized countries [3], occurring at a rate between 3 and 8%, according to the geographic area, in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis [4]. On these assumptions, prevention of population exposure to HCV can be regarded as the most effective tool to reduce liver-related mortality from HCC due to chronic HCV infection. In the HCV scenario, where an effective vaccine is not currently available, antiviral treatments have stood as the real backbone of prophylaxis strategy in the prevention of HCC, of course together with all procedures implemented to prevent HCV transmission [5].However, the evidence that patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) are completely protected against occurrence of HCC by successful IFN-based treatments is controversial, mainly due to methodological limitations of available literature. All in all, HCC risk seems to be sharply attenuated, although not completely eliminated -especially in patients with advanced fibrosis -following eradication of HCV infection, and the causes for this residual HCC risk in patients who achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) remain receding. Moreover, the intrinsic limitations of the use of IFN to patients with less advanced liver disease have curtailed the potential benefit, due to the fact that HCC in HCV cirrhosis becomes more prevalent at the more advanced stages of liver disease.In this review, we discuss the available clinical evidence of the role of antiviral treatment against chronic HCV infection for the prevention of HCC, and the residual risk existing in patients successfully treated. In addition, we focus on the molecular mechanisms that might explain the pathophysiological rationale of the reduction, but not elimination, of HCC risk after HCV eradication. The lesson from the IFN era may be extremely useful to predict the near-future scenario, when For repri...