2019
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1910883116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MAIT Cells Are Major Contributors to the Cytokine Response in Group A Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome

Abstract: Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS) is a rapidly progressing, life-threatening, systemic reaction to invasive infection caused by group A streptococci (GAS). GAS superantigens are key mediators of STSS through their potent activation of T cells leading to a cytokine storm and consequently vascular leakage, shock, and multiorgan failure. Mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells recognize MR1-presented antigens derived from microbial riboflavin biosynthesis and mount protective innate-like immune respon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an effect was dependent on SAg pre-exposure, as a contrasting phenotype was seen when SEB was administered following a pre-existing influenza infection, highlighting the potential core differences in how SAgs can function when exposed to naïve or memory virus-specific CD8 + T cells. SAgs possess the ability to bind αβ TCRs on MHC-restricted CD4 + or CD8 + T cells, but also target unconventional, antimicrobial T cell populations bearing αβ TCRs, such as MAIT cells [ 273 , 274 ] and iNKT cells [ 275 , 276 ] ( Figure 3 ). However, SAgs can also recognise γδ T cells, demonstrating that these toxins can bind TCRs lacking TCR α- or β-chains, and such interaction by certain SAgs involves TRGV9 + γδ TCRs [ 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 ].…”
Section: Bacterial Immune Evasion Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Such an effect was dependent on SAg pre-exposure, as a contrasting phenotype was seen when SEB was administered following a pre-existing influenza infection, highlighting the potential core differences in how SAgs can function when exposed to naïve or memory virus-specific CD8 + T cells. SAgs possess the ability to bind αβ TCRs on MHC-restricted CD4 + or CD8 + T cells, but also target unconventional, antimicrobial T cell populations bearing αβ TCRs, such as MAIT cells [ 273 , 274 ] and iNKT cells [ 275 , 276 ] ( Figure 3 ). However, SAgs can also recognise γδ T cells, demonstrating that these toxins can bind TCRs lacking TCR α- or β-chains, and such interaction by certain SAgs involves TRGV9 + γδ TCRs [ 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 ].…”
Section: Bacterial Immune Evasion Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SAgs can also recognise γδ T cells, demonstrating that these toxins can bind TCRs lacking TCR α- or β-chains, and such interaction by certain SAgs involves TRGV9 + γδ TCRs [ 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 ]. MAIT cells typically encode TCRs with biased TRBV20-1 and TRBV6-2/6-3 gene usage [ 192 ], exposing them to SAgs such as SEB, TSST-1, and SpeC, which was proven in recent studies [ 273 , 274 ]. Indeed, SAg-triggered MAIT cells produce substantially high levels of effector cytokines (e.g., IFNγ), through an IL-12/IL-18-dependent mechanism that does not involve MR1.…”
Section: Bacterial Immune Evasion Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the absence of TCR-dependent antigen recognition, MAIT cells can be activated by cytokines, including IL-12 and IL-18 ( 54 , 106 108 ), and by super-antigens ( 109 ). In one study, the MAIT cell response in group A streptococcus (GAS) infection appeared to contain both TCRβ-dependent (super-antigen) and independent activation ( 110 ). Cytokines likely drive the MAIT cell activation observed in viral infections and contribute to their response during bacterial infection ( 111 ).…”
Section: The Context Of Antigen Recognition Determines Mait Cell Respmentioning
confidence: 99%