2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-019-04450-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maize Iranian mosaic virus (family Rhabdoviridae) improves biological traits of its vector Laodelphax striatellus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings, contrary to our initial hypothesis, come with two caveats: the number of studies remains relatively small, and vectors typically acquire pathogens by feeding on infected plants, making it challenging to disentangle the direct and indirect effects of the pathogen on the insect vector. Some studies limited the contribution of indirect effects by infecting vectors in vitro [14,41,43,45,46,50,[53][54][55] or transferring them regularly onto unexposed plants [50]. For most other studies, whether effects were direct, indirect, likely both, or certainly both were inferred based on pathogen transmission mode and the experimentally infected party (electronic supplementary material, figure S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings, contrary to our initial hypothesis, come with two caveats: the number of studies remains relatively small, and vectors typically acquire pathogens by feeding on infected plants, making it challenging to disentangle the direct and indirect effects of the pathogen on the insect vector. Some studies limited the contribution of indirect effects by infecting vectors in vitro [14,41,43,45,46,50,[53][54][55] or transferring them regularly onto unexposed plants [50]. For most other studies, whether effects were direct, indirect, likely both, or certainly both were inferred based on pathogen transmission mode and the experimentally infected party (electronic supplementary material, figure S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Myzus persicae (green peach aphid)cucumber mosaic virus (CMV)fecundityindirect[37] Capsicum annuum L . Myzus persicae tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV)fecunditylikely both[37] Cucurbita pepo (pumpkin) Aphis gossypii (melon aphid)papaya ring spot virus (PRSV)fecundityindirect[38] Cucurbita pepo Bemisia tabaci (whitefly)squash vein yellowing virus (SqVYV)adult longevity, fecundityindirect[11] Glycine max (soya bean) Aphis glycines (soya bean aphid)soya bean mosaic virus (SMV)fecundityindirect[39,40] Gossypium hirsutum (cotton) Bemisia tabaci (whitefly)tomato yellow leaf curl China virus (TYLCCNV)fecunditydirect[41] Gossypium hirsutum Bemisia tabaci tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV)adult longevity, fecunditylikely both[42] Hordeum vulgare (barley) Laodelphax striatellus (small brown planthopper)maize Iranian mosaic virus (MIMV)adult longevity, fecunditydirect[43] Medicago sativa (alfalfa) Acyrthosiphon pisum (pea aphid)bean leafroll virus (BLRV)survivallikely both[44] Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) Bemisia tabaci (whitefly)tomato yellow leaf curl China virus (TYLCCNV)adult longevity, fecunditylikel...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results come with a caveat: vectors typically acquire pathogens by feeding on infected plants, making it challenging to disentangle the direct and indirect effects of the pathogen on the insect vector. Some studies limited the contribution of indirect effects (14,38,40,42,43,47,(50)(51)(52) by infecting vectors in vitro or transferring them regularly onto unexposed plants (47). For most other studies, whether effects were direct, indirect, likely both, or certainly both was inferred based on pathogen transmission mode and the experimentally infected party (supplementary figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), transmitted by aphids in the non-persistent mode with a short acquisition-access period (AAP), reduced the palatability of host plants to force vector aphids to move to new hosts for CMV transmission (Mauck et al, 2010). On the contrary, the persistent viruses require insect vectors to continuously ingest phloem sap on the virus-infected plants for virion acquisition or inoculation (Su et al, 2015;Jhan et al, 2019;Moeini et al, 2020). Thus, persistent viruses enhance the host plant quality to attract insect vectors for long-term feeding on virus-infected plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%