2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00425-016-2559-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maize proteomic responses to separate or overlapping soil drought and two-spotted spider mite stresses

Abstract: Main conclusionIn maize, leaf proteome responses evoked by soil drought applied separately differ from those evoked by mite feeding or both types of stresses occurring simultaneously.This study focuses on the involvement of proteomic changes in defence responses of a conventional maize cultivar (Bosman) to the two-spotted spider mite infestation, soil drought and both stresses coexisting for 6 days. Under watering cessation or mite feeding applied separately, the protein carbonylation was not directly linked t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plants are commonly exposed to multiple stresses, which can specifically activate different signalling pathways. Several studies have shown that the idea to extrapolate the response to single stress from combined stresses is too simplistic due to the large variety of synergistic or antagonistic signals generated by each single stress in different tissues/organs (aerial or above‐ground organs) and stress timing (concomitant or delayed stresses; De Vleesschauwer et al , Matschi et al , Dworak et al , Nguyen et al , Verma et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Plants are commonly exposed to multiple stresses, which can specifically activate different signalling pathways. Several studies have shown that the idea to extrapolate the response to single stress from combined stresses is too simplistic due to the large variety of synergistic or antagonistic signals generated by each single stress in different tissues/organs (aerial or above‐ground organs) and stress timing (concomitant or delayed stresses; De Vleesschauwer et al , Matschi et al , Dworak et al , Nguyen et al , Verma et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants are commonly exposed to multiple stresses, which can specifically activate different signalling pathways. Several studies have shown that the idea to extrapolate the response to single stress from combined stresses is too simplistic due to the large variety of synergistic or antagonistic signals generated by each single stress in different tissues/organs (aerial or above-ground organs) and stress timing (concomitant or delayed stresses; De Vleesschauwer et al 2013, Matschi et al 2015, Dworak et al 2016, Nguyen et al 2016, Verma et al 2016. and abscisic acid (ABA), acting either synergistically or antagonistically, depending on different stressors, can orchestrate a complex set of early and late responses either locally or distally (Balmer et al 2013, Angulo et al 2015, Caarls et al 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the “plant stress hypothesis” states that drought causes the plant to have a higher nutritional value for herbivores, and the “plant vigor hypothesis” associates a reduction in growth and an increase in defense compounds caused by drought to a lower suitability for herbivores’ feeding ( White, 2009 ). In maize, simultaneous soil drought and T. urticae infestation elevates the amount of proteins that enable maize to maintain the efficiency of photosynthesis and metabolism, as well as to protect its cells against metabolic injuries ( Dworak et al, 2016 ). Besides, drought increases the improved nutritional value of tomato leaves by accumulating free amino acid and sugars, and altering hormonal balance ( Ximénez-Embún et al, 2016 , 2017b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a lack of data on how plants respond to TSSM in the presence of other stresses such as high light. Increasing evidence indicates that plant response to the combination of biotic and abiotic stresses cannot be considered from the knowledge of the individual stress responses (Dworak et al 2016;Suzuki et al 2014). Such evidence strongly supports the idea of a more detailed study with respect a plant's response to simultaneously occurring stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%