1996
DOI: 10.1006/jasc.1996.0070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major and Trace Element Analysis of Modern Egyptian Pottery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6) ones, suggest that the solid solution variscite-strengite, (Al,Fe)(PO4).2H2O, may be the main phosphate mineral. Redmount (1996) reported (Al-Fe)-phosphates in Egyptian ceramics too. SEM/EDS analyses and SEM photomicrographs allowed to identify within the cauixi spicules and in the clayey matrix a new growing mineral aggregates (Fig.…”
Section: Description Of the Minerals And Mineral Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6) ones, suggest that the solid solution variscite-strengite, (Al,Fe)(PO4).2H2O, may be the main phosphate mineral. Redmount (1996) reported (Al-Fe)-phosphates in Egyptian ceramics too. SEM/EDS analyses and SEM photomicrographs allowed to identify within the cauixi spicules and in the clayey matrix a new growing mineral aggregates (Fig.…”
Section: Description Of the Minerals And Mineral Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary of the black earth which are being in detail investigated no consideration has been made about the mineralogy, texture, and chemistry of the archaeological ceramic artifacts found in great quantity in these soils. The application of the mineralogical and geochemical techniques, known as archaeometry (Mommsen, 1986) to study archaeological lithic and ceramic artifacts and as fingerprints aid in understanding modern pottery sourcing have been successfully employed elsewhere by several authors (Noll, 1978;Letsch & Noll, 1983;Freestone & Middleton, 1987;Redmount, 1996;Strazicich, 1998;Costa et al, 1991;Costa & Kern, 1996 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petrographical and chemical studies have been used by Redmount (1996) and Strazicich (1998) to identify the raw material and the source of ceramics from Egypt and Mexico, respectively. The chemical composition data obtained here and the textural and the mineralogical presented by Costa et al, (2004) allow us to propose the following materials as raw materials for the ceramics of Cachoeira-Porteira: 1) Clay materials (mainly kaolinite) from the saprolite horizons or mottled zone of weathered fine-grained acid rocks, for example rhyolites and/or fine-grained granites or even clayey sedimentary rocks (shale).…”
Section: The Raw Materials Of the Abe-ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, while researchers have detected some differences in the geochemistry of both archaeological sherds and raw Nile silt sediment from different time periods (Krom et al, 2002;Mallory-Greenough et al, 1998), results from tests on modern Egyptian pottery found that divisions between certain modern manufacturing locales were clearer than between ancient and modern sherds from similar locales (Redmount and Morgenstein, 1996). Similarly, De Paepe et al (1992) suggests basic compositional continuity among Nubian Kerma ceramics from different time periods.…”
Section: Geochemical Analysis Of Egyptian and Nubian Potterymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Given the difficulties in using traditional methods of categorization to fully address the complexities of ceramic production and distribution in colonial Nubia, we turn to geochemical characterization methods, which have been used with some success to separate Egyptian Nile silt vessels by provenance (e.g. Bourriau, 1998;Bourriau et al, 2006;Mallory-Greenough et al, 1998;Redmount and Morgenstein, 1996;Tschegg et al, 2008) and even to suggest possible local Nubian imitations of Egyptian-style ware in the Kerma period (De Paepe et al, 1992).…”
Section: Geochemical Analysis Of Egyptian and Nubian Potterymentioning
confidence: 99%