A cautionary tale…A 35-year-old woman, 154 cm, 86 kg, with placenta previa and preeclampsia, had massive bleeding after consuming a lunch. She was immediately transferred to the operating room, where an anesthesiologist was called in. She was morbidly obese, having large breasts and a low-pitched voice (indicative of laryngeal edema), and the view of the oropharynx was obscured (Mallampati score 4). Awake tracheal intubation was attempted, but the patient refused to open her mouth. General anesthesia was induced as a rapid sequence, and tracheal intubation was attempted, but failed twice. A senior anesthesiologist was called in and accomplished intubation. Cesarean section was started. Soon after this, it was found that the tube was wrongly inserted into the esophagus. The tube was taken out and mask ventilation was attempted, but this was difficult. Arterial hemoglobin oxygen saturation rapidly decreased to 70 % with cardiac arrhythmia. Nevertheless, the baby was successfully taken out and the mother started to breathe. As the operation would continue, the laryngeal mask airway was inserted. The mother vomited and aspirated. This is a fiction, but we all might have heard about a real story like this. And, what was wrong with this case? Why cannot we clearly answer what should have been done to this case?In this issue of the Journal, Tao et al.[1] report a retrospective analysis of pregnant women who underwent general anesthesia during 2001-2006 in a teaching hospital, to obtain the incidence of 'difficult airway,' which was defined as follows: necessity of three or more attempts at direct laryngoscopy, the use of any maneuvers or techniques outside the rapid sequence induction routine (including mask ventilation resulting from oxygen desaturation from unsuccessful intubation attempts), the use of additional airway equipment, or inability to intubate the trachea. The incidence was 0.56 % (12 of 2,158 patients). They state that tracheal intubation was possible in more than 99.9 % of pregnant patients, and the incidence of difficult airway in pregnant patients is no higher than the incidence in nonpregnant patients. They attempted to seek factors contributing to the difficult airway, and have found that the lack of experience of anesthesia providers increased the incidence, whereas emergency cesarean section did not add another level of difficulty over planned cesarean section [1].So, can we conclude that tracheal intubation in pregnant women is as easy as in nonpregnant patients? The reported incidence in the general population of difficult tracheal intubation is about 1 %, and that for difficult facemask ventilation is as much as 5 % [2-4]. Therefore, it seems reasonable to conclude that the incidence in pregnant patients may be similar to, or not much higher than, the incidence in the general population.Can we then state that the pregnant patients are not at increased risk of serious airway complications during anesthesia? To answer this question, we need to know the risk in the general population. Until recent...