1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0011-393x(05)80698-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major depression complicating hemodialysis in patients with chronic renal failure: A multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial of S-adenosyl-L-methionine versus placebo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…performances of available screening tools for depression has not been done, trials of screening showing efficacy and cost effectiveness in this population are not available, and randomized trials of interventions are limited by small sample size, short duration, and reliance on surrogate outcomes (depression scores). [15][16][17][18][19][20] appropriate as altered drug clearances and frequent cardiovascular comorbidity may alter the relative risks and benefits from treatment in people with CKD. The strengths of this review are the comprehensive search for individual studies, the standardized methodology conducted by two independent reviewers, and the relevance of the findings to clinical practice and research strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…performances of available screening tools for depression has not been done, trials of screening showing efficacy and cost effectiveness in this population are not available, and randomized trials of interventions are limited by small sample size, short duration, and reliance on surrogate outcomes (depression scores). [15][16][17][18][19][20] appropriate as altered drug clearances and frequent cardiovascular comorbidity may alter the relative risks and benefits from treatment in people with CKD. The strengths of this review are the comprehensive search for individual studies, the standardized methodology conducted by two independent reviewers, and the relevance of the findings to clinical practice and research strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 Randomized trials of treatment and screening for depression in CKD are sparse and limited by small sample sizes and surrogate outcomes. [15][16][17][18][19][20] Summarizing the prevalence of depression in people with CKD is therefore an important first step in understanding the burden of illness in this population and developing additional research priorities. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of depression in adults with CKD to explore the prevalence of depressive symptoms and the effects of diagnostic methods and CKD severity on prevalence estimates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the high prevalence of depression and its association with poor outcomes, only a minority of patients with ESKD are given a diagnosis of, or receive treatment for, depression (Hedayati and Finkelstein, 2009). This may in part be due to the limited systematic study in this area, with only six small randomised controlled trials (RCTs) available to guide treatment safety and efficacy (Ancarani, 1993;Baines et al, 2004;Blumenfield et al, 1997;Duarte et al, 2009;Koo et al, 2005;Lii et al, 2007). The following section reviews what pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches are available for the management of depression in CKD.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A statistically significant improvement in depression was found after 4 weeks amongst those given fluoxetine; however, this was not sustained at 8 weeks. Non-randomised, observational studies (Ancarani, 1993;Baines et al, 2004;Blumenfield et al, 1997;Duarte et al, 2009;Koo et al, 2005;Lii et al, 2007) suggest that antidepressant medication may be useful in CKD; however, further studies are needed.…”
Section: Pharmacological Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moderate kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate below 44 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 and/or heavy proteinuria) is associated with a 2- to 3- fold increase in all-cause mortality compared with the general population and for dialysis patients the risk is much higher [7,8]. Despite poorer clinical outcomes, pharmacologic and dialysis-related interventions (including anti-platelet agents, [9] dialysis dose, [10] early dialysis initiation, [11] vitamin D compounds, [12] erythropoietins [13], phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, [14] or antidepressant medication [15-20]) generally do not improve clinical outcomes or quality of life, particularly for those with end-stage kidney disease treated with dialysis. Exploration of additional and modifiable determinants of health in populations with chronic kidney disease would help prioritize the evaluation of novel intervention strategies to improve clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%