2019
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major disturbances test resilience at a long‐term boreal forest monitoring site

Abstract: The impact of disturbances on boreal forest plant communities is not fully understood, particularly when different disturbances are combined, and regime shifts to alternate stable states are possible after disturbance. A long‐term monitored semi‐natural forest site subject to intense combined storm and bark beetle damage beginning in 2005 provided an opportunity to investigate the postdisturbance development of the vegetation community. Previous studies suggest that a shift from Picea … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(114 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interpretation of the Aneboda results is complicated by the extensive disturbances caused by storm and bark beetle damage at the site (Weldon & Grandin 2019). While there is an apparent large decline in the Hultengren sensitivity index and increase in N preference, these were not significant (although the large increase in variation may well be the reason for this lack of significance).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interpretation of the Aneboda results is complicated by the extensive disturbances caused by storm and bark beetle damage at the site (Weldon & Grandin 2019). While there is an apparent large decline in the Hultengren sensitivity index and increase in N preference, these were not significant (although the large increase in variation may well be the reason for this lack of significance).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lichen monitoring is conducted on five randomly selected mature trees (diameter breast height 40–80 cm) from four randomly selected monitoring plots. However, due to severe storm and bark beetle disturbance in 2005–2008 at the Aneboda site (Weldon & Grandin 2019) the trees selected for lichen monitoring are restricted to those monitoring plots that still have living trees. The lichen monitoring follows a repeated measure design with inventories of the same trees every fifth year, resulting in four inventories at each site, as of 2020.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential to support forest resilience to future disturbances can be enhanced by managing the biological components of ecosystem legacies [11,27,28]. For example, refuge areas in managed forest are suggested as mitigation to harmful effects of timber harvest or salvage [17,29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%