1972
DOI: 10.1021/jf60181a063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major fecal metabolite of dieldrin in rat. Structure and chemistry

Abstract: The structure (C-12 jy «-hydroxy dieldrin) of the major fecal metabolite of dieldrin in the rat has been confirmed via pmr spectroscopy employing spin decoupling techniques and the new shift reagent, Eu(DPM)3. Detailed studies of the spectral and reaction properties of this metabolite have established the stereochemical structure and have shown that the system is susceptible to degradation. Evidence is presented which indicates that the major fecal metabolite in the rat cannot be converted to the major urinary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For pesticides that have carbon atoms devoid of protons (such as the reactive chlorinated end of endrin or dieldrin) the pmr technique alone is clearly inadequate even though it has been widely used for this purpose (Parsons and Moore (1966), Marchand and Rose (1968), Bukowski and Cisak (1968), McCullock et al (1969), and ). Keith (1971) and McKinney et al (1972), in an effort to study degradation reactions of some pesticides, have implemented the use of pmr spectroscopy by employing additional techniques such as proton spin decoupling and a chemical-shift reagent, Eu(dpm)s, tris(dipivalomethanato)europium(III). These studies, while accurately describing the structural features of that portion of the molecule containing protons, yielded no information whatever concerning the crucial chlorinated section of the molecule.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pesticides that have carbon atoms devoid of protons (such as the reactive chlorinated end of endrin or dieldrin) the pmr technique alone is clearly inadequate even though it has been widely used for this purpose (Parsons and Moore (1966), Marchand and Rose (1968), Bukowski and Cisak (1968), McCullock et al (1969), and ). Keith (1971) and McKinney et al (1972), in an effort to study degradation reactions of some pesticides, have implemented the use of pmr spectroscopy by employing additional techniques such as proton spin decoupling and a chemical-shift reagent, Eu(dpm)s, tris(dipivalomethanato)europium(III). These studies, while accurately describing the structural features of that portion of the molecule containing protons, yielded no information whatever concerning the crucial chlorinated section of the molecule.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%