2020
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II (DRB3) Genetic Diversity in Spanish Morucha and Colombian Normande Cattle Compared to Taurine and Zebu Populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gir MDMs showed higher expression of Bovine Leukocyte Antigen (BOLA) family (BOLA-DQ A2, logFC = -6.9 and P = 3.80E-10; BOLA-DQA5, logFC = -6.2 and P = 7.68E-08; BOLA-DQB, logFC = -3.5 and P = 0.0006; Fig 3A; S4 Table) and C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5; logFC = -1.9 and P = 0.0006; Fig 3A; S4 Table). Interestingly, BoLA receptor family mediate antigen presentation to T-lymphocytes and its variant alleles has been linked to differences in resistance to many disease, including mastitis caused by gram negative bacteria [42][43][44]. The CCR5 receptor acts on leucocyte recruitment to inflammation site [45] and, coupled with BOLA, might influence differential outcomes of immune response in each bovine breed.…”
Section: Breed-specific Bovine Mdm Transcriptional Signatures and Itsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gir MDMs showed higher expression of Bovine Leukocyte Antigen (BOLA) family (BOLA-DQ A2, logFC = -6.9 and P = 3.80E-10; BOLA-DQA5, logFC = -6.2 and P = 7.68E-08; BOLA-DQB, logFC = -3.5 and P = 0.0006; Fig 3A; S4 Table) and C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5; logFC = -1.9 and P = 0.0006; Fig 3A; S4 Table). Interestingly, BoLA receptor family mediate antigen presentation to T-lymphocytes and its variant alleles has been linked to differences in resistance to many disease, including mastitis caused by gram negative bacteria [42][43][44]. The CCR5 receptor acts on leucocyte recruitment to inflammation site [45] and, coupled with BOLA, might influence differential outcomes of immune response in each bovine breed.…”
Section: Breed-specific Bovine Mdm Transcriptional Signatures and Itsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, polymerase chain reaction-sequence based typing (PCR-SBT) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and target next generation sequencing (Target-NGS) [28] are the most commonly employed and powerful tools used in this type of analysis. However, these techniques have been applied in studies which have included only a handful of the over 800 recognized cattle breeds worldwide [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Consequently, there are still a number of breeds that remain uncharacterized, and this number increases when local native bovine breeds are considered [17,18,26,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of these studies there are 144 described BoLA-DRB3 alleles for bovines, and 303 subtypes listed in the Immuno Polymorphism Database (IPD-MHC) [30,31]. In addition, previous studies [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] have shown an even distribution of BoLA-DRB3 polymorphisms between the major bovine types (Bos taurus and B. indicus) and breeds. This is likely as a result of various factors including breed origin, artificial or natural selection and geographical distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its central role in the immune response, the genetic diversity of the BoLA-DRB3 gene has been characterized in a limited number of breeds and cross-breeds from Europe, Asia and the Americas using polymerase chain reaction-sequence based typing (PCR-SBT; [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]) and target next generation sequencing (Target-NGS; [30]), the most powerful tools used to identify diversity of BoLA-DRB3 alleles in cattle breeds. Until now, private African BoLA-DRB3 alleles have been reported by authors using indirect techniques, such as PCR-RFLP, followed by cloning and sequencing [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%