2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major influence of interobserver reliability on polytrauma identification with the Injury Severity Score (ISS): Time for a centralised coding in trauma registries?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, few studies have focused on ISS performance in young children [17]. Despite a number of proposed modifications and alternate scoring systems, ISS remains the most widely used to define severely injured patients, which is why we chose it [16, 18, 19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few studies have focused on ISS performance in young children [17]. Despite a number of proposed modifications and alternate scoring systems, ISS remains the most widely used to define severely injured patients, which is why we chose it [16, 18, 19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Injury-related variables. Patient stratum (admission/ICU), lowest Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) on day of injury (before sedation) (3 = worst, 15 = best) (25), Injury Severity Score (ISS) (0 = no trauma, 75 = not survivable) (26,27), length of stay at trauma hospital (in days), isolated TBI or TBI with associated injuries, intracranial surgery (no/yes), number of in-hospital transitions, Glasgow outcome scale at day of discharge (GOS 1 = dead, GOS 2 = persistent vegetative state, GOS 3 = severely disabled, GOS 4 = moderately disabled, GOS 5 = good recovery) (28).…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trauma registries have traditionally relied on manual data abstraction of clinical notes from dedicated registry staff entered into separate proprietary software registry platforms or simple spreadsheets [7]. Missing data and inter-relater reliability are well described issues [16,17]. Lack of data from non-trauma hospitals limits the ability to describe the true extent of trauma care for severely injured patients who were not transferred to designated trauma centres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%