1991
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.303.6802.531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major orthopaedic surgery on the leg and thromboembolism.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite pressure from lawyers and other branches of the medical profession, 17,22 many orthopaedic surgeons are reluctant to use chemical prophylaxis because of doubts about its efficacy and possible haemorrhagic complications. 23 Charnley abandoned the use of phenindione because the benefit from a reduction in the mortality rate due to pulmonary embolism was matched by an increased mortality from gastrointestinal haemorrhage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite pressure from lawyers and other branches of the medical profession, 17,22 many orthopaedic surgeons are reluctant to use chemical prophylaxis because of doubts about its efficacy and possible haemorrhagic complications. 23 Charnley abandoned the use of phenindione because the benefit from a reduction in the mortality rate due to pulmonary embolism was matched by an increased mortality from gastrointestinal haemorrhage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The use of chemical prophylaxis is associated with a definite incidence of morbidity and mortality due to bleeding complications 3,5,17 and many regimes have been shown to be both expensive and ineffective having poor compliance, especially when using combined modalities. 18,19 Murray et al 1 concluded that "there is no good evidence that any pharmacological agent does more good than harm after a routine total hip replacement" and earlier claims that prophylaxis should be mandatory, 20 have since been put into perspective. In the light of these findings, the views of orthopaedic surgeons appear to be changing, [3][4][5] with a reluctance to accept unnecessary and avoidable complications and a resurgence of interest in mechanical methods of prophylaxis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of current knowledge, withholding proper prophylactic measures in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery is not acceptable (44). It is recommended that LMWH or warfarin be used in patients with hip fractures.…”
Section: Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 98%