“…A large number of field campaigns have analyzed the aging of various normalized biomass burning aerosol properties within the plume. In this study, normalized refers to correcting a property for dilution and background concentrations by subtracting off the background value and then dividing the property by a conserved quantity, usually an effectively inert species, such as CO. Studies focusing on the aging of organic aerosol mass report a range of changes to the net (difference between total secondary organic aerosol [SOA] production and OA evaporation) normalized OA within the plume (Shrivistava et al, 2017): some of these studies reported an OA gain (Alvarado & Prinn, 2009;Cachier et al, 1995;Formenti et al, 2003;Liu et al, 2016;Reid et al, 1998;Vakkari et al, 2014Vakkari et al, , 2018Yokelson et al, 2009), some an OA loss (Akagi et al, 2012;Forrister et al, 2015;Hobbs et al, 2003;Jolleys et al, 2012Jolleys et al, , 2015May et al, 2015), and others showed no significant change in OA (Brito et al, 2014;Capes et al, 2008;Collier et al, 2016;Cubison et al, 2011;Hecobian et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2016;May et al, 2015;Nance et al, 1993;Sakamoto et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2017). However, sampling noise due to different sampling times, collection efficiencies, and other issues can also make it ambiguous whether net normalized OA increased in a single fire (e.g., the analysis of Alvarado and Prinn (2009) of the Timbavati fire from Hobbs et al (2003)).…”