2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-018-0170-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major secondary aerosol formation in southern African open biomass burning plumes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
129
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
10
129
7
Order By: Relevance
“…There are regions within our parameter space of our sensitivity studies in which intermediate plumes do not increase in normalized OA mass (Figures S15 and S17 in the supporting information). Further, some field experiments have seen factors of 2-3 in mass enhancements (Vakkari et al, 2014(Vakkari et al, , 2018Yokelson et al, 2009), higher than observed in this study, and this discrepancy could be related to differences in particle and (Table 1). Warm colors indicate an increase in ΔOA/ΔCO after 4 hr of aging, and cool colors represent a decrease.…”
Section: Smoke Mass Aging Depends On Fire Size Dilution Evaporationcontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There are regions within our parameter space of our sensitivity studies in which intermediate plumes do not increase in normalized OA mass (Figures S15 and S17 in the supporting information). Further, some field experiments have seen factors of 2-3 in mass enhancements (Vakkari et al, 2014(Vakkari et al, , 2018Yokelson et al, 2009), higher than observed in this study, and this discrepancy could be related to differences in particle and (Table 1). Warm colors indicate an increase in ΔOA/ΔCO after 4 hr of aging, and cool colors represent a decrease.…”
Section: Smoke Mass Aging Depends On Fire Size Dilution Evaporationcontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…There are regions within our parameter space of our sensitivity studies in which intermediate plumes do not increase in normalized OA mass (Figures S15 and S17 in the supporting information). Further, some field experiments have seen factors of 2–3 in mass enhancements (Vakkari et al, , ; Yokelson et al, ), higher than observed in this study, and this discrepancy could be related to differences in particle and precursor‐vapor emissions, in‐plume oxidant concentrations (Yokelson et al, ), or other factors not explored in this study. The differences in our model results here and previously observed measurements should be investigated in a future study in order to attempt to discern what other factors are strongly controlling net OA mass, especially in larger fires.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations