2005
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major Structural Differences and Novel Potential Virulence Mechanisms from the Genomes of Multiple Campylobacter Species

Abstract: Sequencing and comparative genome analysis of four strains of Campylobacter including C. lari RM2100, C. upsaliensis RM3195, and C. coli RM2228 has revealed major structural differences that are associated with the insertion of phage- and plasmid-like genomic islands, as well as major variations in the lipooligosaccharide complex. Poly G tracts are longer, are greater in number, and show greater variability in C. upsaliensis than in the other species. Many genes involved in host colonization, including racR/S,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
430
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 485 publications
(448 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
14
430
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, future biochemical and genetic studies are needed to fully define the function of C. rectus 314 ciaB. CiaB genes have been identified from several species of campylobacters that do not typically reside in the oral cavity of humans including C. jejuni, C. lari, C. coli, C. fetus, and C. upsaliensis [21,22]. However, during the course of characterizing the ciaB from C. rectus 314, potential ciaB genes were identified among campylobacters that do reside within the oral cavity of humans (Table 3) including C. rectus 33238 (ZP03610758.1, annotated at NCBI as a lipoprotein signal peptidase), C. curvus (YP001407631.1, annotated as a hypothetical protein), and C. concisus (EAT98433.1, 4 Agarose gel of C. rectus DNA amplified using primers designed to amplify the complete ciaB gene ( Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of course, future biochemical and genetic studies are needed to fully define the function of C. rectus 314 ciaB. CiaB genes have been identified from several species of campylobacters that do not typically reside in the oral cavity of humans including C. jejuni, C. lari, C. coli, C. fetus, and C. upsaliensis [21,22]. However, during the course of characterizing the ciaB from C. rectus 314, potential ciaB genes were identified among campylobacters that do reside within the oral cavity of humans (Table 3) including C. rectus 33238 (ZP03610758.1, annotated at NCBI as a lipoprotein signal peptidase), C. curvus (YP001407631.1, annotated as a hypothetical protein), and C. concisus (EAT98433.1, 4 Agarose gel of C. rectus DNA amplified using primers designed to amplify the complete ciaB gene ( Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. curvus, like C. rectus, is an oral bacteria associated with periodontitis [36]. BLASTx analysis of the amplicon from strain 314 revealed a gene fragment sharing sequence identity and similarity (53 and 70 %, respectively) to the [21] ciaB gene from C. jejuni (NCBI, AAD38497.1). The sequence of the 448 base pair amplicon was used as a template for PCR-based gene walking.…”
Section: Identification Of C Rectus 314 Ciabmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…IVSs are absent from all three 23S rRNA gene copies of C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (32) but were detected in other strains of C. jejuni and C. coli (29,33,41) and were also identified in all three copies of the 23S rRNA gene in the recently sequenced genome of C. coli RM2228 (12). When present, the IVS is located only 891 nucleotides (nt) upstream from the site in the 23S rRNA gene where a point mutation (A2075G) has been associated with high-level resistance to erythromycin in Campylobacter (12,14,20). Surveys of C. jejuni from broilers showed that only a minority of strains (approximately 10%) contained IVSs (29,33).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A ligação desta toxina à superfície da célula hospedeira é mediada pelas proteínas CdtA e CdtC seguida da entrega de CdtB ao núcleo celular do hospedeiro (Pickett et al, 1996;Fouts et al, 2005;Asakura et al, 2008). Dessa maneira, a bactéria causa danos ao DNA da célula hospedeira e promove a interrupção do ciclo celular.…”
Section: Manifestações Clínicas E Patogêneseunclassified