2009
DOI: 10.1177/0022185609104304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major Tribunal Decisions in 2008

Abstract: On 28 March 2008 a historic process of award modernization, by which Australia's award system will be fundamentally changed, began. Over 4000 existing federal awards and NAPSAs will be replaced by modern awards created primarily along industry lines, and occasionally along occupational lines. Modern awards will operate from January 2010 and, together with the National Employment Standards, will constitute the safety net under Labor's industrial relations system. This article considers some aspects of the award… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the end of 2009, when the AIRC ceased functioning, over 1,500 awards and associated instruments had been reviewed and 122 'modern awards', based on industry or occupation, had been created (Gillard, 2009a). This was a 'truly daunting task' (Catanzariti and Brown, 2009: 381), which was motivated by a desire to simplify and streamline industrial relations processes, to reduce business costs and to promote productive, flexible workplaces (Gillard, 2009b: 1). Along with these ambitious goals, the Deputy PM required that the outcome of the review would, among other things, neither 'disadvantage employees' nor 'increase costs for employers' (Gillard, 2009b: 1).…”
Section: Award Modernizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the end of 2009, when the AIRC ceased functioning, over 1,500 awards and associated instruments had been reviewed and 122 'modern awards', based on industry or occupation, had been created (Gillard, 2009a). This was a 'truly daunting task' (Catanzariti and Brown, 2009: 381), which was motivated by a desire to simplify and streamline industrial relations processes, to reduce business costs and to promote productive, flexible workplaces (Gillard, 2009b: 1). Along with these ambitious goals, the Deputy PM required that the outcome of the review would, among other things, neither 'disadvantage employees' nor 'increase costs for employers' (Gillard, 2009b: 1).…”
Section: Award Modernizationmentioning
confidence: 99%