2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2010.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Majoritic garnet: A new approach to pressure estimation of shock events in meteorites and the encapsulation of sub-lithospheric inclusions in diamond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(170 reference statements)
3
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the production of diamond forming melts of oceanic crust in the transition zone as the carbonated MORB solidus intersects slab geotherms between ~ 350 and 600 km depth (Thomson et al, 2016). This depth range is consistent with barometry estimates for the formation pressures of diamond-hosted garnet inclusions (Beyer, 2015;Collerson et al, 2010;Harte, 2010;Stachel, 2001). Although, it is unclear whether majorite barometers can be applied to natural inclusions, given they are believed to have co-crystallised from a melt with calcium perovskite (Thomson et al, 2016) and undergone some reequilibration during uplift (Harte and Cayzer, 2007;Thomson et al, 2014) that may not have been fully accounted for in reported compositions.…”
Section: Is Inclusion Enrichment An Indicator Of a Low-degree Melt Sosupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This is consistent with the production of diamond forming melts of oceanic crust in the transition zone as the carbonated MORB solidus intersects slab geotherms between ~ 350 and 600 km depth (Thomson et al, 2016). This depth range is consistent with barometry estimates for the formation pressures of diamond-hosted garnet inclusions (Beyer, 2015;Collerson et al, 2010;Harte, 2010;Stachel, 2001). Although, it is unclear whether majorite barometers can be applied to natural inclusions, given they are believed to have co-crystallised from a melt with calcium perovskite (Thomson et al, 2016) and undergone some reequilibration during uplift (Harte and Cayzer, 2007;Thomson et al, 2014) that may not have been fully accounted for in reported compositions.…”
Section: Is Inclusion Enrichment An Indicator Of a Low-degree Melt Sosupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The formation pressures of the two majoritic garnet inclusions have been calculated using the geobarometer of Collerson et al (2010). Pressures for the bulk composition of each inclusion are calculated as 15.2 ± 1.4 and 12.9 ± 1.4 GPa, suggesting original growth at depths equivalent to the shallowest parts of the transition zone.…”
Section: Depth Of Individual Inclusion Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garnets of pyroxenitic affinity are higher in MgO and lower in Al 2 O 3 than those of eclogitic affinity. Using geobarometers based on the Si content of majoritic garnet (Collerson et al, 2010;Beyer, 2015), these inclusions were formed at pressures of 7-18 GPa with values above 15 GPa being rare. At these pressures clinopyroxene should coexist with the garnet in some, but not all, pyroxenitic compositions, an inference which is supported by general compositional differences between majorite garnet and bulk MORB and pyroxenite Pieces of the Earth's mantle occurring either as tectonic fragments or xenoliths in volcanic rocks are dominantly peridotites, assemblages of olivine, ortho-and clinopyroxene with minor garnet and/or spinel.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%