Make it Your Own: How Process Valence and Self‐Construal Affect Evaluation of Self‐Made Products

Abstract

Self‐production, participation of consumers in the production process of products for their own consumption, leads to consumers’ enhanced evaluations of the self‐made products. Three experimental studies investigate how and why self‐production affects consumers’ product evaluations and reveal that not all production experiences create additional value for all consumers. In particular, Studies 1 and 2, using hypothetical stories and real experiences, show that only positive (vs. negative) production experiences enhance evaluations of self‐made products over products made by others. Positive (but not negative) experiences decrease the psychological distance between the self and the product and strengthen identification with it. Study 3 manipulates self‐construal (independent vs. interdependent) to investigate its role on evaluation of self‐made products and products made with close others as a group (i.e., group‐made). Consumers with independent self‐construal evaluate self‐made (vs. other‐made) products more favorably only if the process is positive. However, consumers with interdependent self‐construal evaluate self‐made products more favorably even if the process is negative. Additionally, consumers with interdependent (vs. independent) self‐construal exhibit more favorable evaluation of group‐made products. Finally, even if consumers know how another person feels while making a product, other people's process emotions do not affect consumers’ product judgments as strongly as their own experienced process emotions.

Beyond the Usefulness of Branded Applications: Insights from Consumer–Brand Engagement and Self‐construal Perspectives

“…Recently, self-construal theory has been applied in various contexts, such as mobile service adoption, customer behaviors, consumer-brand relationships, customer relationship management (CRM), purchase behavior, social behavior, and media use (Qi et al, 2014;Swaminathan, Page, & Gurhan-Canli, 2007;Zhang et al, 2014). Self-construal, in general, can affect the nature of an experience, how the experience is shaped, and its outcomes (Atakan, Bagozzi, & Yoon, 2014). Selfconstrual theory may engender systematical means for turning simple, key effects associated with branded apps usage into more insightful conditional relationships.…”

Visual Representations of Taiwanese Endemic Bird Species on Digital Media

“…In addition to mere abstraction, designers also employ various other techniques to accentuate detail, through stylization, when simplifying objects to convey their desired message. Stylized objects or graphics not only deepen the impressions of viewers but also enable greater self-awareness through the viewer's interpretation of the meaning behind the graphics, in addition to enabling constant self-examination (Grubb & Grathwohl, 1967;Kleine III, Kleine, & Kernan, 1993;Atakan, Bagozzi, & Yoon, 2014a;2014b). Meyer and Laveson (1981) classified graphics (from realistic depictions to pure abstractions) into five levels as follows: (1) natural photography, where the visual features of objects are realistically depicted through photography;…”

Do I seem real to you? The role of external audiences in the consumption‐driven self‐authentication process

“…The object then embodies the creator by representing their skills and traits (Csikszentmihalyi & Rochberg‐Halton, 1981). Therefore, consumers have stronger identification with self‐made objects (Atakan, Bagozzi, & Yoon, 2014a, 2014b) and engage in self‐integration, creating a linkage between the self and the created object (Troye & Supphellen, 2012). This leads to a strong self‐object association in which the object is incorporated into the extended self (Belk, 1988; Csikszentmihalyi & Rochberg‐Halton, 1981; Pierce, Kostova, & Dirks, 2003).…”