2019
DOI: 10.33256/hj29.1.5770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Make the Adder Count: population trends from a citizen science survey of UK adders

Abstract: Concern has been growing about the status of UK adder populations, with expert opinion reporting widespread declines. Assessing the true scale of these declines, however, has been hampered by a lack of quantitative data. Make the Adder Count began in 2005 as a national surveillance programme collecting standardised counts of adders lying-out after emerging from hibernation. 260 sites have contributed data, confirming a significant decline, on average, across sites with small populations, while the few with lar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We initially adopted a standard panel of microsatellite-based summary statistics, including genetic diversity and the standard F IS measure of inbreeding, to allow comparison with published studies of adders in mainland Europe. We also applied the MTAC criterion of a threshold peak count to categorise study sites into small or large, predicted to be at high or low risk of decline respectively [34]. This initial panel of genetic tests generated a similar pattern of results across all the UKAGP study sites, irrespective of size, although there was a modest decrease in mean allele richness in small populations relative to large.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We initially adopted a standard panel of microsatellite-based summary statistics, including genetic diversity and the standard F IS measure of inbreeding, to allow comparison with published studies of adders in mainland Europe. We also applied the MTAC criterion of a threshold peak count to categorise study sites into small or large, predicted to be at high or low risk of decline respectively [34]. This initial panel of genetic tests generated a similar pattern of results across all the UKAGP study sites, irrespective of size, although there was a modest decrease in mean allele richness in small populations relative to large.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the UK, the MTAC survey demonstrated opposite average population trends between sites with small and large adder populations, the threshold being a mean normalised peak count of 10 adders, below which there was significant decline over time [34]. This provides an approach of demonstrated demographic relevance with which to classify and compare populations according to their likely risk of decline.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations