Making a Spectacle of Oneself in the Academy Using the H-Index: From Becoming an Artificial Person to Laughing at Absurdities

Abstract

This article offers autoethnographic insights into the consequences of making a spectacle of oneself in the audit culture of the academy. Spectacle 1 explores my experiences of using the h-index as part of an annual salary review and how this made me feel like an artificial person. Spectacle 2 shows how, at a conference, I used laughter to expose some absurdities of the h-index and felt better for doing so. Stories that tell different truths about ourselves in combination with the corporeality of laughter, I suggest, can assist us to re-attune ourselves and resist the process of becoming artificial persons.

Institutional Accreditation and the Professionalisation of Teaching in the HE Sector

“…In relation to teaching credentials targets are most frequently monitored and managed via probationary policies designed to ensure requirements are written into appointment letters. This is certainly not the intention of the accrediting body, but a consequence of the managerialist demands and 'audit culture' of HE [4,48]. In this survey the polarised views surrounding target setting were also evident.…”

Supporting casual teaching staff in the Australian neoliberal university: A collaborative approach

“…The intensification of academic life resulting from the structural transformation of universities has been welldocumented (Gill, 2014;Hartug et al, 2017;May et al, 2013;Sparkes, 2021). The neoliberalisation of universities has produced working environments increasingly characterised by corporatisation, privatisation and managerialism (Hartman & Darab, 2012).…”

“…To the best of our knowledge, this transition has been organic rather than orchestrated. Changes in the employment status of the teaching team may reflect the workload pressure felt by tenured academics (Sparkes, 2021) and the rapidly escalating share of the university workforce with casual or fixed-term employment (Baré et al, 2021;Kniest, 2018).…”

“…Jason Casual staff are at the 'bottom rung' of academia and can struggle to be treated as serious academics (Kneist, 2018). While this can be challenging, it means that casual staff may be somewhat shielded from the competitiveness and performativity identified by Sparkes (2021). Arguably, this may make it easier for casual staff to demonstrate vulnerability and/or have their ideas challenged and be open to learning.…”

“…The neoliberal turn in higher education has changed the very nature of academic work (Connell, 2013). Among the effects of sector restructuring are the development of a competitive workplace culture with an emphasis on measurement and assessment and a concomitant decline in collegiality between academics (Berg & Seeber, 2016;Hartman & Darub, 2012;Sparkes, 2021). The widespread casualisation of the workforce has produced an academic precariat (Gill, 2014;Hartung et al, 2017;Ivancheva, 2015;May et al, 2013) of which the authors of this paper are currently members.…”