2018
DOI: 10.1002/leap.1154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making accessibility more accessible to publishers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microsoft Word and LaTeX both support necessary features for screen reader users such as a deined heading structures, but Microsoft Word seems to succeed more at producing PDFs that preserve accessibility without the need to make reinements with additional software like Adobe Acrobat Pro. Furthermore, Microsoft Word is likely to be more readily available to authors than Adobe Acrobat Pro, even though both require a licence 13 , and Microsoft Word requires less digital literacy than using the tagging features ofered by Adobe Acrobat Pro, which is temperamental and can be used incorrectly if the user is not knowledgeable about best practice for tagging PDFs.…”
Section: Creating Accessible Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microsoft Word and LaTeX both support necessary features for screen reader users such as a deined heading structures, but Microsoft Word seems to succeed more at producing PDFs that preserve accessibility without the need to make reinements with additional software like Adobe Acrobat Pro. Furthermore, Microsoft Word is likely to be more readily available to authors than Adobe Acrobat Pro, even though both require a licence 13 , and Microsoft Word requires less digital literacy than using the tagging features ofered by Adobe Acrobat Pro, which is temperamental and can be used incorrectly if the user is not knowledgeable about best practice for tagging PDFs.…”
Section: Creating Accessible Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there has been advocation for accessibility becoming integral to creating academic content [13]. SIGCHI has already committed to making sure the academic papers from its many conferences are accessible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encouraged by the Mellon foundation, accessibility has been a challenge that many of the new platforms have been wrestling with as have many others across the publishing industry (Conrad & Kasdorf, 2018 A growing concern, however, has been with the amount of additional labour that requiring accessibility for multimodal publications imposes on authors and publishers. Audio and video files need to be captioned or transcribed, images need alt-text to be written, and more complex digital objects, such as 3D models, need explanations to be written that explain why they may not be fully accessible.…”
Section: Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%