1999
DOI: 10.1038/4439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making and reading microarrays

Abstract: There are a variety of options for making microarrays and obtaining microarray data. Here, we describe the building and use of two microarray facilities in academic settings. In addition to specifying technical detail, we comment on the advantages and disadvantages of components and approaches, and provide a protocol for hybridization. The fact that we are now making and using microarrays to answer biological questions demonstrates that the technology can be implemented in a university environment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
293
0
8

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 572 publications
(302 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
293
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…A panel of 12 288 CpG island clones was created from the CGI genomic library from Cross et al, 1994, as part of the Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Center (Heisler et al, 2005). Inserts from this CGI library were polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified, purified by ethanol precipitation and then arrayed onto glass microscope slides by a specialised robot designed and created at Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Cheung et al, 1999;Adrien et al, 2006). The Differential Methylation Hybridisation (DMH) technique was carried out as previously described (Yan et al, 2002).…”
Section: Cpg Island Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A panel of 12 288 CpG island clones was created from the CGI genomic library from Cross et al, 1994, as part of the Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Center (Heisler et al, 2005). Inserts from this CGI library were polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified, purified by ethanol precipitation and then arrayed onto glass microscope slides by a specialised robot designed and created at Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Cheung et al, 1999;Adrien et al, 2006). The Differential Methylation Hybridisation (DMH) technique was carried out as previously described (Yan et al, 2002).…”
Section: Cpg Island Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to remove molecular oxygen, samples were degassed via several freeze-pump-thaw cycles prior to the introduction of xenon. Figure 5; 10 Hz in Figures 4,7,8;and 20 Hz for intensities integrated in Figure 6. Ninety-degree pulses were used for acquiring spectra unless otherwise noted.…”
Section: Nmr Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] The spatial separation of possible interacting pairs distinguishes signals from different ligand-target combinations, and readings are made by scanning techniques or by imaging. 8 At present, particular challenges exist in the development of multiplexed assays, which allow multiple interactions in samples to be detected simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For yeast experiments, DNA was labeled with allylamine-dUTP (Sigma), and reactive Cy3 and Cy5 succinamide ester monofunctional dyes (Amersham Pharmacia) were coupled to the DNA following a protocol described at www.microarrays.org. CMT-Yeast microarrays (version 1.32, Corning) containing 6135 unique ORFs were prehybridized in 35% formamide, 0.5% SDS, ‫ן4‬ SSPE, ‫ן5.2‬ Denhardt's, and 0.2 mg/mL herring sperm DNA for at least 2 h. In the meantime, ∼ 200 ng of Cy3-and Cy5-labeled yeast DNA was mixed with 15 µg of yeast tRNA (GIBCO BRL) in a final hybridization volume of 60 µL (35% formamide, 0.5% SDS, ‫ן4‬ SSPE, ‫ן5.2‬ Denhardt's; protocol adapted from Cheung et al 1999). After denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, hybridization was performed under a coverslip (LifterSlip) at 50°C for 18-19 h. Following hybridization, the coverslip was removed in ‫ן1‬ SSC, 0.1% SDS, then the microarray was washed in ‫ן2.0‬ SSC, 0.1% SDS for 10 min and in ‫ן2.0‬ SSC for 20 min ‫.…”
Section: Dna Labeling and Hybridization To Microarraysmentioning
confidence: 99%