2015
DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2015.1003369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making bottom-up and top-down processes meet in public innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
14

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
29
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Such differences perhaps reflect lack of dissemination of information which could be addressed by services. Innovation and improvement are most likely when there is greater sharing of information [27]. SSS personnel cited e-cigarettes as the most important reason for the decline in service footfall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such differences perhaps reflect lack of dissemination of information which could be addressed by services. Innovation and improvement are most likely when there is greater sharing of information [27]. SSS personnel cited e-cigarettes as the most important reason for the decline in service footfall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors were chosen mainly for their wide presence in the literature on innovation in PEs. They can be seen in the articles of Arduini et al (2010); Arundel et al (2015); Borins (2002Borins ( , 2001); Fernández and Wise (2010); Saari, Lehtonen, & Toivonen (2015), while the Environmental Care determinant was included due to the current importance in society as well as its scarce presence in previous articles on PEs.…”
Section: Internal Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concerns the capacity that the central government has to generate or influence in the regulatory and legal framework the incentives and investments for the development of innovation at the public and private level (Agolla & Lill, 2013;Fernández & Wise, 2010;Vigoda-Gadot et al, 2008;Walker, 2008). It permits protecting public interests, when market failures exist (Saari et al, 2015), affecting the social relationships and those of power in benefit of priority sectors, making investments in traditional and technological mega-projects (Agolla & Lill, 2013;Mazzucato, 2014), structural reforms in education, training policies, entrepreneurship, fiscal policies, standardization of products/services, support to public research institutes, policies for the creation of networks and knowledge spaces, infrastructure and offer of technology (Agolla & Lill, 2013;OECD, 2010).…”
Section: Government: Political and Legal Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementing organizational innovations, particularly in public sector organizations, often uses top‐down approaches – initiated and championed by policy‐makers. These do not allow for employee‐initiated innovations to surface (Saari et al ., ). Ryan et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Implementing organizational innovations, particularly in public sector organizations, often uses top-down approaches -initiated and championed by policymakers. These do not allow for employee-initiated innovations to surface (Saari et al, 2015). Ryan et al (2008) point out the need for the inclusion of employees in decisionmaking when trying to implement public management initiatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%