2022
DOI: 10.1017/glj.2022.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making Do With What We Have: On the Interpretation and Enforcement of the EU’s Founding Values

Abstract: Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) solemnly proclaims that the EU is founded on the respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights. Yet, a growing body of case law concerning rule of law backsliding continuously reminds us of the lack of a dedicated functional mechanism to remedy this. We are left with a fragmented understanding of the founding values and a patchy framework for their enforcement: whilst there is increasing guidance on judicial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29 Rather, the Commission based its claim on Article 19 TEU in several infringement actions related to the independence of the judiciary in Poland, 30 or on different provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights in a series of cases against Hungary. 31 In these cases, Article 2 TEU played at best an 'ancillary' function, 32 for example to support the broad interpretation of Article 19 TEU and the principle of judicial independence as an expression of the rule of law. 33 More fundamentally, doubts remain whether Article 2 TEU is at all enforceable in infringement actions, whether it can be used as a stand-alone provision and ground of infringement in these cases, and whether it could even be used to capture breaches of EU values that would not otherwise fall within the scope of EU law.…”
Section: The Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Rather, the Commission based its claim on Article 19 TEU in several infringement actions related to the independence of the judiciary in Poland, 30 or on different provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights in a series of cases against Hungary. 31 In these cases, Article 2 TEU played at best an 'ancillary' function, 32 for example to support the broad interpretation of Article 19 TEU and the principle of judicial independence as an expression of the rule of law. 33 More fundamentally, doubts remain whether Article 2 TEU is at all enforceable in infringement actions, whether it can be used as a stand-alone provision and ground of infringement in these cases, and whether it could even be used to capture breaches of EU values that would not otherwise fall within the scope of EU law.…”
Section: The Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%