2009
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.080512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making early childhood count

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CHMS excludes children under 3 years and has limited data on children 3 to 5 years of age (15) . If Canada aims to make 'early childhood count', we will need to identify feasible surveillance approaches (1) . In the current study we present two successful approaches to sentinel site surveillance through paediatric and community-based health-care practitioners: the CPSP (www.cpsp.cps.ca/) and TARGet Kids!…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CHMS excludes children under 3 years and has limited data on children 3 to 5 years of age (15) . If Canada aims to make 'early childhood count', we will need to identify feasible surveillance approaches (1) . In the current study we present two successful approaches to sentinel site surveillance through paediatric and community-based health-care practitioners: the CPSP (www.cpsp.cps.ca/) and TARGet Kids!…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stakeholders can use geographic information system (GIS) mapping tools to chart patterns of social risk and disease epidemiology across local populations. The broad use of the Early Development Instrument (EDI) to measure and map school readiness across communities Canada and Australia is an excellent prototype of such an approach (Centre for Community Child Health n.d.; Hertzman and Williams 2009). These data can demonstrate the impact of gradients in social risk, and motivate communities to tackle social issues and prioritize prevention and intervention strategies.…”
Section: Raise Public Awareness About Social Determinants Of Healthmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Because the investments of one sector (e.g., health during the early years) result in benefits to another sector (e.g., lower rates of special education services), it is often difficult to account for and incentivize necessary investments, when little or no financial benefit accrues to the sector making that investment. The discounting of children's needs and their relative invisibility in the realm of public policy is further exacerbated by existing data systems, which are not equipped to produce a picture of the "whole child" nested in the context of the families and communities in which they reside, or to give valid estimates of the longitudinal costs of shortchanging investments in children and their families (Hertzman and Williams 2009). Consequently, the creation of child and family policies remains a low-status occupation, with service sectors competing with each other for marginal resources.…”
Section: Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hertzman and Williams (2009) suggested one approach to gathering such data is through the use of indirect assessments such as populationbased surveys. Such surveys require individual data collection for all children in a given location, but enable aggregation of data to examine development (and factors impacting development) at a community level.…”
Section: Population-based Measures Of Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%