Making Governance Networks Effective and Democratic Through Metagovernance

Abstract

In response to the growing discrepancy between the steadily rising steering ambitions and the increasing fragmentation of social and political life, governance networks are mushrooming. Governance through the formation of networks composed of public and private actors might help solve wicked problems and enhance democratic participation in public policy‐making, but it may also create conflicts and deadlocks and make public governance less transparent and accountable. In order to ensure that governance networks contribute to an effective and democratic governing of society, careful metagovernance by politicians, public managers and other relevant actors is necessary. In this paper, we discuss how to assess the effective performance and democratic quality of governance networks. We also describe how different metagovernance tools can be used in the pursuit of effective and democratic network governance. Finally, we argue that public metagovernors must develop their strategic and collaborative competences in order to become able to metagovern governance networks.

Smart City Governance: A Local Emergent Perspective

“…This diversity in objectives means, according to these authors, that the success of collaborative governance can only be assessed in terms of stakeholder satisfaction (Koppenjan and Klijn 2004, p. 124). The emerging consensus is that a combination of evaluation criteria is needed for a comprehensive assessment (Radaelli and De Francesco 2010;Koppenjan and Klijn 2004;Provan and Milward 2001;Sørensen and Torfing 2009). A sophisticated approach to the evaluation of collaborative governance has been developed by Provan and Milward (2001) that brings together the two other approaches and adds an intermediate level.…”

Who should do what in environmental management? Twelve principles for allocating responsibilities

“…This argument seems to run counter to modern governance approaches that emphasize collaboration in networks rather than formal responsibilities (e.g. Crona and Hubacek, 2010;Rhodes, 2007;Sørensen and Torfing, 2009). Yet, much of this collaboration takes place in the shadow of formal arrangements (Bulkeley et al, 2012).…”

Governança e Eficácia de Redes Interorganizacionais: Comparação entre iniciativas brasileiras de redes de cooperação

“…Suas origens datam dos estudos seminais realizados na década de 90 por Provan e Milward (1994. Com a ascensão das iniciativas de cooperação entre empresas e a descentralização em rede da instituição de políticas públicas, as publicações científicas sobre o tema vêm se expandido (MANDELL; KEAST, 2008;SØRENSEN;TORFING, 2009;TURRINI et al, 2010), inclusive abordando suas questões e implicações gerenciais (BORGSTRÖM, 2013). Em sua origem, a eficácia era explicada apenas por fatores estruturais e contextuais, como a integração de rede, o controle externo e a estabilidade do sistema (PROVAN; MILWARD, 1995).…”