2019
DOI: 10.1002/jlb.5ce1019-262r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making HIS mice more human-like

Abstract: Discussion on exhaustion/senescence marker profiles on human T cells in BRGSF-A2 humanized mice and how they resemble those in human samples; describes how this model fits into the humanized-mouse research field.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other additive hypoimmune editing approaches may be needed, such as a promising CD64 overexpression strategy recently described by Gravina et al 51 Relatedly, better in vitro and in vivo models of human antibody-mediated rejection are needed to adequately interrogate these types of research questions. Humanized mouse models are quite useful for T cell-mediated rejection and natural killer cell-mediated allorejection studies, [64][65][66][67] but the most commonly used humanized mice are suboptimal for antibody-mediated rejection studies due to B cell immaturity and impeded class switching in de novo antibodies. 68 Our group and others are working on new iterations of humanized mouse models that incorporate more robust T cell, natural killer cell, and innate immune cell repertoires in order to improve their utility for transplantation immunology-focused research studies, and creation of tractable models harboring antigen-specific IgG antibody pools is an area of intense focus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other additive hypoimmune editing approaches may be needed, such as a promising CD64 overexpression strategy recently described by Gravina et al 51 Relatedly, better in vitro and in vivo models of human antibody-mediated rejection are needed to adequately interrogate these types of research questions. Humanized mouse models are quite useful for T cell-mediated rejection and natural killer cell-mediated allorejection studies, [64][65][66][67] but the most commonly used humanized mice are suboptimal for antibody-mediated rejection studies due to B cell immaturity and impeded class switching in de novo antibodies. 68 Our group and others are working on new iterations of humanized mouse models that incorporate more robust T cell, natural killer cell, and innate immune cell repertoires in order to improve their utility for transplantation immunology-focused research studies, and creation of tractable models harboring antigen-specific IgG antibody pools is an area of intense focus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore important to choose carefully both the appropriate tissues and mouse strains for your experiments. We have discussed this topic in previous publications (McIntosh & Brown, 2015; Simpson & Brown, 2020). We recommend that every researcher who is beginning to work with humanized mice consult the article by Shultz et al.…”
Section: Humanized Mice Varieties and Recommendations For Hpsc Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore important to choose carefully both the appropriate tissues and mouse strains for your experiments. We have discussed this topic in previous publications Simpson & Brown, 2020). We recommend that every researcher who is beginning to work with humanized mice consult the article by Shultz et al (2012) in Nature Reviews Immunology for an introduction to these The four types of humanized mice that we recommend for PSC studies are:…”
Section: Step 1: Choice Of Mouse Host Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%