2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11422-022-10105-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making “it” matter: developing African-American girls and young women’s mathematics and science identities through informal STEM learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we are promoting science for all, then our structures and systems should ensure that everyone has equitable access to opportunities and resources. For girls who tend to have negative experiences with STEM in traditional STEM environments, such as schools, informal STEM learning can help alter their perceptions of what it means to be a girl in STEM, provide encouragement to pursue and persist in STEM careers, and help counter the disparities for Black girls in mathematics and science [36,37,57,58]. Social-emotional development, which encompasses skills such as self-awareness, empathy, and responsible decision making, has the potential to create supportive STEM learning spaces for girls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we are promoting science for all, then our structures and systems should ensure that everyone has equitable access to opportunities and resources. For girls who tend to have negative experiences with STEM in traditional STEM environments, such as schools, informal STEM learning can help alter their perceptions of what it means to be a girl in STEM, provide encouragement to pursue and persist in STEM careers, and help counter the disparities for Black girls in mathematics and science [36,37,57,58]. Social-emotional development, which encompasses skills such as self-awareness, empathy, and responsible decision making, has the potential to create supportive STEM learning spaces for girls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These programs must be in spaces that affirm their identities and cultural referents to improve the learning experiences of Black girls. Programs such as the Girls STEM Institute (GSI) revealed an increase in Black girls' mathematics and science self-efficacy and value of STEM knowledge [37]. Anissa, a participant in the study, shared how her spirit was broken in school when a trusted teacher stated, "You do know no college is going to accept you."…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Black girls may have a passion for STEM, it does not always lead to them choosing STEM majors or related post-secondary opportunities (Lane & Id-Deen, 2020;Ong et al, 2018). Morton and Smith-Mutegi (2022) highlighted the disparities in Black girls' education, notably the absence of culturally relevant content and a sense of belonging in STEM classes. Despite Black girls' potential, they often face lowered expectations from teachers due to racial and gender biases (Morton & Smith-Mutegi, 2022).…”
Section: Stem Learning Environments and Curriculamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the racial and gendered identities of these Black and Brown girls have often been constructed as “physical and intellectual hindrances” (Farinde & Lewis, 2012, p. 422). Hence, those representing the Collective Black —such as Black and Brown girls—learn early on that aspects of their social identities, or the sum of what makes them who they are does not fit the valued cultural and social norms of being and acting like a science person (i.e., middle‐class white masculinity) (Morton & Smith‐Mutegi, 2022; Parsons, 1997; Thomas et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are many studies that examine the racialized or gendered science experiences of Black and Brown girls longitudinally (Hanson, 2004; Morton & Smith‐Mutegi, 2022), in elementary schools (Archer et al, 2010; Tucker‐Raymond et al, 2007), middle schools (Tan & Calabrese Barton, 2010), high schools (Aschbacher et al, 2010; Brickhouse & Potter, 2001; Visintainer, 2020), in addition to undergraduate and graduate programs (Carlone & Johnson, 2007; Hazari et al, 2013; Morton & Parsons, 2018; Ong et al, 2011), there are limited studies that examine how language becomes another mechanism of racialization contributing to the (dis)identification and self‐doubts about being and becoming a science person. Drawing on an instrumental case study design (Stake, 1995) and identity‐as‐narrative analysis (Juzwik, 2006), our study aims to fill this gap in science education research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%