2015
DOI: 10.1080/15022250.2015.1067643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making It Right the Third Time? Pursuing Satisfaction and Loyalty in a Double Service Recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such studies have primarily identified concrete actions that can restore customers' trust and reduce their retaliatory instincts. All studies with this theme, barring Räikkönen and Honkanen (2016) and Arora and Mathur (2020), attempted to understand how specific recovery attributes result in a successful recovery. However, they differed on how this can be achieved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies have primarily identified concrete actions that can restore customers' trust and reduce their retaliatory instincts. All studies with this theme, barring Räikkönen and Honkanen (2016) and Arora and Mathur (2020), attempted to understand how specific recovery attributes result in a successful recovery. However, they differed on how this can be achieved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Johnston and Fern (1999: 71), service recovery refers to a situation where service providers "seek out and deal with service failures". Therefore, it can be argued that service recovery is an attempt to retain existing customers by restoring their level of satisfaction (Raikkonen & Honkanen, 2016). In fact, service recovery is so important for both service providers and customers, that Sabharwal, Soch and Kaur (2010) believe that service recovery is a decisive moment in a customer relationship.…”
Section: Service Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the type of service recovery that takes place, Raikkonen and Honkanen (2016) posit that service providers should first consider the customer"s level of dissatisfaction before a decision is made on which service recovery strategy should be followed. Furthermore, tangible service recoveries are most relevant in the case of outcome-related service failures, whereas a psychological service recovery approach is preferred in the case of process-related service failures (Chuang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Service Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations