2017
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2017.2748899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making Likelihood Ratios Digestible for Cross-Application Performance Assessment

Abstract: Performance estimation is crucial to the assessment of novel algorithms and systems. In detection error tradeoff (DET) diagrams, discrimination performance is solely assessed targeting one application, where cross-application performance considers risks resulting from decisions, depending on application constraints. For the purpose of interchangeability of research results across different application constraints, we propose to augment DET curves by depicting systems regarding their support of security and con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, forensic science has gained insight from the findings in biometrics, with several authors developing movement-modeling techniques [60][61][62][63][64] to represent handwriting movement. There has been a research effort towards descriptor development and feature selection in dynamic signatures [9,10,[147][148][149][150] or adapting automated comparison systems to forensic purposes [151][152][153][154]. Furthermore, the criticism has led forensic scientists to provide evidence for expert opinion reliability [155][156][157][158][159][160], to reconsider the identification and unicity paradigms [161,162] and to publish their methods [76] and best practices [163,164].…”
Section: Methodology In Dynamic Signature Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, forensic science has gained insight from the findings in biometrics, with several authors developing movement-modeling techniques [60][61][62][63][64] to represent handwriting movement. There has been a research effort towards descriptor development and feature selection in dynamic signatures [9,10,[147][148][149][150] or adapting automated comparison systems to forensic purposes [151][152][153][154]. Furthermore, the criticism has led forensic scientists to provide evidence for expert opinion reliability [155][156][157][158][159][160], to reconsider the identification and unicity paradigms [161,162] and to publish their methods [76] and best practices [163,164].…”
Section: Methodology In Dynamic Signature Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have also been many advances in methods for validation criteria [45][46][47]. Further progress in feature characterization could be achieved through computational techniques [18,19,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. Forensic handwriting examination has been able to take advantage of this research [31,[55][56][57], but no major methodological breakthroughs related to dynamic signatures have been achieved in recent years.…”
Section: Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the size of the key space). Figure 4 shows DET curves (with axes using a standard deviate scale [30]) for some of the best performing system configurations. Plots for each IC parts ∈ {2, 4, 8} show the three best configurations in terms of biometric performance and three best configurations in terms of workload reduction.…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%