Making masculinity: Negotiations of gender presentation among Latino gay men

Abstract

Many studies of masculinity examine the experiences of White men, men of color and White gay men, but often do not incorporate the experiences of gay men of color. This study builds on recent work on Latino gay immigrants by focusing on the experiences of US-born Latino gay men, who have received relatively scant attention by researchers. Drawing from ethnographic findings of gay Latino social circles, this study examines how gay Latino men negotiate boundaries of masculinity. These men employ specific strategies when "doing" masculinity, which in turn are shaped by their racialization as Latinos within the US context, their gendered socialization within their immigrant family, and feelings of exclusion from mainstream gay spaces. These findings have implications for better understanding and addressing racial and class schisms within the larger LGBT movement. Latino Studies (2012) 10, 448-472.

Mobile Masculinities: An Investigation of Networked Masculinities in Gay Dating Apps

“…A parallel manifestation of racial preference was also uncovered in sections of the user's profiles that allowed the user to describe preferences in their own words. Statements such as "typically prefer white guys" (Tanner) and "Safe fun with young fit guys prefer white guys but not opposed to others" (Benno) coincide with those of other scholars who found that gay culture is not only gendered, but also can be particularly racialized (Ocampo, 2012;Ward, 2008).…”

Is Gaydar Affected by Attitudes Toward Homosexuality? Confidence, Labeling Bias, and Accuracy

“…Furthermore, presentation may be influenced by a range of factors such as sexuality, culture, and femininity or masculinity (e.g. Ocampo, 2012). Additional research investigating ratings of other photograph types is recommended.…”

Examining identity development among gay men of color

“…The dearth of literature on the ways that gay men of color come to develop a gay identity is particularly noteworthy given that there has been an explosion of scholarly examinations into the importance of “queer identities.” Yet the overwhelming majority of studies continue to center on the experiences of gay White men or fail to adequately discuss identity development by taking identity as a given, rather than something that develops through social interaction and/or individual actions within a social context. Pondering the paucity of research, specifically on identity development among gay men of color, Ocampo () provides a number of factors that have limited academic inquiry into the topic including the exclusion of gay men of color from mainstream gay social networks, difficulties in locating gay men of color for empirical studies, and the different ways that gay men of color may self‐identify outside of more academic and popular notions of what it means to be “gay.” Offering a more critical view regarding the absence of LGBTQ people of color in the field of queer studies in general, Johnson (, p. 3) argues that queer theory's focus on “notions of selfhood, agency, and experiences” makes it unable to adequately interrogate the experiences of gays and lesbians who are also raced. In fact, even when non‐White LGBTQ are acknowledged by White scholars, they fail to recognize “the ways in which their own whiteness informs their own critical queer positions” (Johnson, , p. 130).…”