The idea of a "Brazilian racial democracy" first gained traction during the early 20th century and quickly spread thereafter.1 Racial democracy came to signify intense race mixing, in which the blurring of race-group boundaries would foreshadow the creation of a postracial individual, free from discrimination. It is ironic that the ideology of living in a "race-free" society has held back scientific inquiry into the existence of racial/ethnic disparities in Brazil for several decades.
2This history of not openly talking about race in Brazil is well exemplified by the 2010 Census, which was the first ever to include a question about race in the national survey applied to every resident.3 (Before 2010 all data about race were based on samples.) The results showed a country divided between Whites and non-Whites, with 47.73% Whites, 7.61% Blacks, 43.13% mixed races (pardos), 1.09% Asians, and 0.43% indigenous. The census also revealed the depth of socioeconomic racial inequalities in Brazil. 4 Whites earn an average monthly income that is 84.50% higher than Blacks' (R$ 1535.47 vs R$ 832.25) and 81.96% higher than mixed races' (R$ 843.87).Results from a 2008 nationally representative, probability-based, multistage survey of Brazilian households had previously indicated that Whites also have higher education levels and report better self-rated health than Blacks and mixed races. 5 Whites were significantly more likely to have 8 years or more of formal education (51.68% vs 41.64% and 36.75%, respectively), and less likely to have no education (11.82% vs 16.40% and 18.41%, respectively). These socioeconomic disparities by race in Brazil compare unfavorably with those in the United States, a country that shares a history of slavery, but unlike Brazil went through an additionally extended period of overt racial segregation (Jim Crow laws) that persisted well into the second half of the 20th century. This association between Black (or mixed) racial status and having both lower income and education, along with high crime rates in the communities in which they live, has had an important effect in perpetuating racial prejudice in Brazil. 7 Studies have found that when asked to identify the race of other people, respondents display a tendency to "Whiten" the other person's race, a bias known as "interviewer Whitening." 8 This is considered to be a way to avoid offending the other person.
9Analyzing race and mortality in Brazil has been long problematic for 2 reasons: first, as already mentioned, no complete data existed for population distribution by race; second, the quality of mortality data was considered to be unsatisfactory. As recently as 2000, it was estimated that only 85.4% of deaths were reported to authorities, and by 2010 the proportion had increased to 92.3%, a level of coverage similar to most developed countries.
10The objective of the present study was to use the recently released 2010 Census data to compare life expectancy at birth in Brazil for Whites, Blacks, and mixed races. We then aimed to decompose the l...