2018
DOI: 10.1017/s1049096518000458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making North–South Research Collaborations Work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critiques of the TRC approach have included the questioning of how the process of knowledge co‐production and co‐creation operates within research realities (Schmidt & Pröpper, 2017), how the distribution of power can affect the outcomes of TRCs, and how structural asymmetries, unspoken assumptions and operational constraints may have an impact on equity within such collaborations (Bleck et al, 2018). Furthermore, there are complex challenges that originate in the funding structures, which present a challenge for such TRCs when attempting to ensure that the collaborations are non‐hierarchical, built on mutual understanding and trust, and reflect the different values and priorities of the collaborators.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critiques of the TRC approach have included the questioning of how the process of knowledge co‐production and co‐creation operates within research realities (Schmidt & Pröpper, 2017), how the distribution of power can affect the outcomes of TRCs, and how structural asymmetries, unspoken assumptions and operational constraints may have an impact on equity within such collaborations (Bleck et al, 2018). Furthermore, there are complex challenges that originate in the funding structures, which present a challenge for such TRCs when attempting to ensure that the collaborations are non‐hierarchical, built on mutual understanding and trust, and reflect the different values and priorities of the collaborators.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My third proposal is a possible solution to address this problem: rather than focusing on extracting data from interlocutors merely for our career advancement-essentially a form of surplus value in the Marxian sense-and thereby widening the gap between us, perhaps we should consider other types of collaborative working possibilities, such as formulating advocacy strategies with our community partners and working on a collaborative writing project. Bleck, Dendere, and Sangaré (2018) described other examples, such as organizing research and professionalization training for young researchers from local institutions, writing op-eds with local researchers, and maintaining iterative professional interactions with local communities.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks: Suggestions For Moving Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This symposium builds on the 2018 PS: Political Science & Politics profession symposium on community-engaged research methods (Michelitch 2018), which highlighted the importance of local engagement and collaboration in political science research, particularly across Global North/Global South lines (Bleck, Dendere, and Sangaré 2018;Thachil and Vaishnav 2018). These articles continue to explore lines of inquiry raised in that symposium, with a particular focus on concept development, data reliability, and accuracy in research that includes people affected by the themes of our research, as well as the ethics of care for the communities in which we operate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%