2009
DOI: 10.3758/16.2.374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making psycholinguistics musical: Self-paced reading time evidence for shared processing of linguistic and musical syntax

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
245
8
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
29
245
8
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, a number of researchers have proposed that processing of musical syntax and language syntax draw on similar or identical cognitive resources (e.g. Fiveash & Pammer, 2012;Koelsch, Gunter, Wittforth, & Sammler, 2005;Patel, 2003;Slevc, Rosenberg, & Patel, 2009). One possibility that we did not test in the current study is that understanding of syntax in language could be related to understanding of harmonic syntax in music.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…In recent years, a number of researchers have proposed that processing of musical syntax and language syntax draw on similar or identical cognitive resources (e.g. Fiveash & Pammer, 2012;Koelsch, Gunter, Wittforth, & Sammler, 2005;Patel, 2003;Slevc, Rosenberg, & Patel, 2009). One possibility that we did not test in the current study is that understanding of syntax in language could be related to understanding of harmonic syntax in music.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…O foco de estudo mais comum entre os artigos selecionados foi o processamento auditivo 19-22 e a cognição [11][12][13][14] , sendo a abordagem comportamental [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] , comparou o desempenho de crianças de cinco anos com e sem musicalização em tarefas de processamento auditivo e apreciação musical. Os resultados demonstram que a prática musical exerce influência positiva sobre habilidades auditivas avaliadas nos testes de memória sequencial verbal e não-verbal com quatro estímulos sonoros e na tarefa de apreciação musical, com significância estatística.…”
Section: Qi -Quociente De Inteligênciaunclassified
“…Fiveash & Pammer, 2014). Slevc et al (2009) relied on temporary syntactic ambiguities (garden path sentences), where readers are slower to comprehend the disambiguating word was in a sentence like "The scientist proved the hypothesis was false" compared to an unambiguous context like "The scientist proved that the hypothesis was false." This slowed processing presumably reflects the need to revise an initial syntactic interpretation where "the hypothesis" was interpreted as the direct object of the verb proved rather than as the subject of an embedded sentence complement (see Pickering & van Gompel, 2006, for a review).…”
Section: Music/language Interactions and The Shared Syntactic Integramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These inferior frontal regions have also been implicated in the processing of rhythmic structure (Vuust, Roepstorff, Wallentin, Mouridsen, & Østergaard, 2006;Vuust, Wallentin, Mouridsen, Østergaard, & Roepstorff, 2011), and both frontal and temporal regions show equal sensitivity to temporal structure in music and speech (Abrams et al, 2011). Finally, there is a growing body of behavioral evidence linking the processing of musical and linguistic structure (e.g., Hoch, Poulin-Charronnat, & Tillmann, 2011;Fedorenko, Patel, Casasanto, Winawer, & Gibson, 2009;Slevc, Rosenberg, & Patel, 2009), as discussed below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%