2013
DOI: 10.4161/hv.26264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making rabies prophylaxis more economical

Abstract: The 2-1 IM regimen demonstrates the same safety and efficacy as the Essen regimen. The use of the 2-1 IM regimen could not only reduce the personal economic burdens of rabies immunization but also improve rabies immunization rates through fewer office visits and compliance with immunization procedures. However, further evaluation is needed before a major recommendation can be made.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In principle, PEP compliance could be increased by: reducing patient costs by increasing the government subsidization above the current rate of 30%; requiring animal owners to pay for PEP; reducing travel expenses with shorter vaccination schedules requiring fewer clinic visits and making vaccine more widely available; and use of intradermal (ID) vaccinations that require smaller, more cost-effective volumes [ 22 ]. For example, alternative vaccination regimens have been proposed that can be completed within 1 week with three intramuscular vaccinations in two visits [ 23 ] or four ID vaccinations in three visits [ 24 ]. Current WHO guidelines recommend such ID PEP regimens, which are effective cost- and vaccine-saving measures that require up to 80% less vaccine per dose than intramuscular administration [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, PEP compliance could be increased by: reducing patient costs by increasing the government subsidization above the current rate of 30%; requiring animal owners to pay for PEP; reducing travel expenses with shorter vaccination schedules requiring fewer clinic visits and making vaccine more widely available; and use of intradermal (ID) vaccinations that require smaller, more cost-effective volumes [ 22 ]. For example, alternative vaccination regimens have been proposed that can be completed within 1 week with three intramuscular vaccinations in two visits [ 23 ] or four ID vaccinations in three visits [ 24 ]. Current WHO guidelines recommend such ID PEP regimens, which are effective cost- and vaccine-saving measures that require up to 80% less vaccine per dose than intramuscular administration [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PVRV for intramuscular pre-and post-exposure rabies prophylaxis manufactured by Chengda Biotechnology has been proven to be well tolerated and immunogenic with an acceptable safety profile in China. [19][20][21][22][23] It has been approved initially by SFDA to use under the Essen regimen in 2005, and permitted to use Zagreb regimen later. Until now, the vaccine has been used 3 million under Zagreb regimen, however, it remained far below than Essen regimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the WHO position paper, the 2-week intramuscular regimen (1-1-1-1-0; 1-site intramuscular on days 0, 3, 7 and between day 14–28) and the three-week intramuscular regimen (2-0-1-0-1; 2-sites intramuscular on days 0 and 1-site intramuscular on days 7, 21) are also recommended as the simplified post-exposure prophylaxis. The IPC regimen shows the same safety and efficacy as the Essen regimen [ 110 ]. Compared with standard intramuscular injection, the IPC regimen can produce an equivalent immune response at a lower dose, to reduce the dosage and direct cost of the vaccine by 60–80% [ 111 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%