2009
DOI: 10.1080/02568540909594666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making Sense of Competing Constructs of Teacher as Professional

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fenech and Sumsion's study (2007b, p. 119), ECEs fuelled a collective 'ethic of resistance' via critical reflexivity with which they 'challeng[ed] taken-for-granted assumptions and truths, and interrogat[ed] the social and political underpinnings and ramifications of accepted ways of practice'. The use of theoretically-informed critical reflection also enabled ECEs to imagine 'other possibilities' for themselves -in their 'professional' roles (Fenech & Sumsion, 2007b;Langford, 2008;Andersson & Hellberg, 2009;Giugni, 2011), in relation to policy (Osgood, 2010), to make links with their 'intuitive' understandings (Moyles, 2001;Johansson et al, 2007), and as the basis for advocating and justifying their practice choices (Moyles, 2001;Edwards, 2005Edwards, , 2006Fenech & Sumsion, 2007a;Sisson, 2009). Educators in the studies we analysed attributed their development of capacity for critical reflexivity to involvement in (for example): university-level study (Fenech & Sumsion, 2007b); professional learning (Moyles, 2001;Edwards, 2005Edwards, , 2006Fenech et al, 2010;Osgood, 2010); and/or by taking part in research projects that involved their engagement with critically reflective practices (Moyles, 2001;Edwards, 2005Edwards, , 2006Bown & Sumsion, 2007;Fenech & Sumsion, 2007b;Fenech et al, 2010).…”
Section: Critically Reflective Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Fenech and Sumsion's study (2007b, p. 119), ECEs fuelled a collective 'ethic of resistance' via critical reflexivity with which they 'challeng[ed] taken-for-granted assumptions and truths, and interrogat[ed] the social and political underpinnings and ramifications of accepted ways of practice'. The use of theoretically-informed critical reflection also enabled ECEs to imagine 'other possibilities' for themselves -in their 'professional' roles (Fenech & Sumsion, 2007b;Langford, 2008;Andersson & Hellberg, 2009;Giugni, 2011), in relation to policy (Osgood, 2010), to make links with their 'intuitive' understandings (Moyles, 2001;Johansson et al, 2007), and as the basis for advocating and justifying their practice choices (Moyles, 2001;Edwards, 2005Edwards, , 2006Fenech & Sumsion, 2007a;Sisson, 2009). Educators in the studies we analysed attributed their development of capacity for critical reflexivity to involvement in (for example): university-level study (Fenech & Sumsion, 2007b); professional learning (Moyles, 2001;Edwards, 2005Edwards, , 2006Fenech et al, 2010;Osgood, 2010); and/or by taking part in research projects that involved their engagement with critically reflective practices (Moyles, 2001;Edwards, 2005Edwards, , 2006Bown & Sumsion, 2007;Fenech & Sumsion, 2007b;Fenech et al, 2010).…”
Section: Critically Reflective Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, rather than reinvigorating a focus upon 'emotionality' as a counter-discourse to regulatory regimes (as in, Moyles, 2001;Osgood, 2010), the Australian studies tended to explore and highlight the complexity of ECEs' professional practice, their intellectual capacities and critical engagement (Skattebol, 2003;Edwards, 2005;Fenech & Sumsion, 2007b;Fenech et al, 2010;Giugni, 2011). By contrast, studies conducted in the USA and Canada were mainly concerned with tensions between culturally and epistemologically hegemonic discourses constituting 'good' practice (Garavuso, 2007;Moore & Gilliard, 2007;Sisson, 2009;Adair, 2011), and being a 'good' ECE (Langford, 2008).…”
Section: Phases Of the Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This construction is also evident in images of students and parents as 'customers' (Sisson, 2009), and of the teacher as a technician 'in the service of implementation' (Parr, 2004, p. 33). One of the preschool teachers, Sam, illustrated this as she described a 'big push' by the school's leadership:…”
Section: Teachers As Techniciansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to support strong teacher identity formation within these borderlands, teacher educators and researchers need to help teachers recognize and make sense of the landscape of competing conceptions of what is "best" for students that often defines these borderlands. Supporting strong teacher identities means supporting the agency of teachers to make choices within their practice that reflect their professional and local knowledge of what students need (Manning-Morton, 2006;Sisson, 2009).…”
Section: Interpretations: Understanding Dissonancementioning
confidence: 99%