2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making sense of conceptual tools in student-generated cases: Student teachers' problem-solving processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the complexity and length of the projects, organizing and attending to a sequential structure in which knowledge is not only generated and discussed but also taken and followed up, elaborated upon, and refined is of essential importance. The current findings suggest that materializing knowledge, whether in a preliminary or advanced form of elaboration, into situational objects (Jahreie 2010) serves to preserve the continuity of the process. It also aids the progressive accumulation of conceptualizations and elaborations (Muukkonen and Lakkala, 2009) and contributes to the co-construction process by freezing the generated knowledge at particular moments during the process.…”
Section: Multi-layeredness and Temporalitymentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the complexity and length of the projects, organizing and attending to a sequential structure in which knowledge is not only generated and discussed but also taken and followed up, elaborated upon, and refined is of essential importance. The current findings suggest that materializing knowledge, whether in a preliminary or advanced form of elaboration, into situational objects (Jahreie 2010) serves to preserve the continuity of the process. It also aids the progressive accumulation of conceptualizations and elaborations (Muukkonen and Lakkala, 2009) and contributes to the co-construction process by freezing the generated knowledge at particular moments during the process.…”
Section: Multi-layeredness and Temporalitymentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The objects embody knowledge that is not in the mind but rather is externalized in something (such as ideas or actions) that is accessible to the whole group and can be used to produce new knowledge. As an analytic stance, this study adopts the distinction between generalized objects of activity, which are historically developed, and situational objects (Jahreie 2010), which are discursively constructed in the interaction of the learners. This position situates the shared knowledge objects at the center of the interaction process, either as instruments or as objects of inquiry, not only as end outcomes.…”
Section: An Integrative Analytic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I det følgende presenteres studier gjort ved Universitetet i Oslo (Fosse, 2011;Jahreie 2010;Ottesen, 2006;Ottesen & Jahreie, 2010a, 2010b som kan belyse dette. Disse studiene tar utgangspunkt i sosiokulturelle forskningsmetoder.…”
Section: Laering I Og Mellom Kontekster I Laererutdanningen Studier unclassified
“…Context can be understood as activity, and a local situation is always embedded in a larger activity. This means that the scrutinised situation in this simulation was part of an activity, which shaped the possibilities and limits for actions (Engeström 1987;Jahreie 2010).The activity was police education, with the object of preparing students for their future work by learning how to manage a critical incident. The simulation could therefore be seen as a tool for learning (Linell 2009;Säljö 2000;Säljö 2005;Wertsch 1998) for participating students.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%