“…A growing number of revisionist interpretations of Linnaeus's taxonomic practice show that once the essentialism story is recognized for what it is—a phantasm—the evidence that speaks in favor of an empiricist, inductive approach starts to fall into place (Atran, 1990; Müller‐Wille, 1999, 2007, 2011, 2013; Winsor, 2001, 2006a; Stevens, 2002; Amundson, 2005; McOuat, 2009; Scharf, 2009; Wilkins, 2009; Richards, 2010). With the narrative of Linnaeus's aprioristic philosophy gone, what had appeared to be the scientific exceptions to his method turned out to form the core of his approach.…”