2011
DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2011.564613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making sense of EU comprehensive security towards conceptual and analytical clarity

Abstract: European leaders frequently vaunt the European Union's distinctiveness in adopting and pursuing a comprehensive approach to security. The EU's profile as an international actor is designed to span across all dimensions of security. As a result, its security policy portfolio involves a large number of institutional actors and policies that need to be coordinated. The ambition of the EU to provide security in a comprehensive manner raises challenges at the politico-strategic level, at the level of operational an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In December 2003, the member states agreed on the European Security Strategy, which underlined the Union's preference for conflict prevention and its ambition actively to use the 'full spectrum of instruments (…) including political, diplomatic, military and civilian, trade and development activities' (Council of the European Union 2003, p. 11). In the following years, European leaders frequently vaunted the Union's added value in 256 N. Koenig what became known as a comprehensive approach to security and crisis management (Gebhard andNorheim-Martinsen 2011, Zwolski 2012).…”
Section: Bridging Divisions: the Narrative Of Comprehensive Powermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In December 2003, the member states agreed on the European Security Strategy, which underlined the Union's preference for conflict prevention and its ambition actively to use the 'full spectrum of instruments (…) including political, diplomatic, military and civilian, trade and development activities' (Council of the European Union 2003, p. 11). In the following years, European leaders frequently vaunted the Union's added value in 256 N. Koenig what became known as a comprehensive approach to security and crisis management (Gebhard andNorheim-Martinsen 2011, Zwolski 2012).…”
Section: Bridging Divisions: the Narrative Of Comprehensive Powermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…26 Likewise the EU endorses a "comprehensive approach" that aims at integrating political, military, civilian, economic, and developmental aid instruments. 27 The AU is horizontally and vertically integrating different instruments and actors. Horizontally the AU covers the full cycle of security management (at least on paper) in terms of conflict prevention through the APSA and various initiatives addressing the security-development nexus through the New Partnership for Africa's Downloaded by [University of Victoria] at 18:12 18 November 2014 Development (NEPAD) and postconflict peace building concepts.…”
Section: The Emerging Security Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Comprehensive Approach to security is the way the EU seeks to operationalise these ideas. 8 It is, however, widely recognised that implementation raises a range of challenges 'at the politico-strategic level, at the level of operational and policy planning and in day-to-day implementation'. 9 In their framework to analyse capabilities, Whitman and Wolff emphasise that capabilities should be understood in their respective contexts (the context-capability nexus).…”
Section: Forging and Contesting Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%