2015
DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2014.965837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making Sense of Hurtful Mother-in-law Messages: Applying Attribution Theory to the In-Law Triad

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A series of independent samples t tests were conducted to examine several potential covariates, including the length of the child and child‐in‐law's courtship prior to engagement or marriage (Merrill, ), relationship status of the child‐in‐law (i.e., affianced or married; Cotterill, ), and the presence or absence of children/grandchildren (Fischer, ), as well as participant sex (mother‐in‐law vs. father‐in‐law) and the child‐in‐law's sex (i.e., daughter‐in‐law vs. son‐in‐law; Mikucki‐Enyart, ). In addition, given that same‐sex in‐law relationships (e.g., mother‐ and daughter‐in‐law) are purported to be more tumultuous than opposite‐sex in‐law dyads (e.g., Duvall, ; Merrill, ; Rittenour & Koenig Kellas, ), a two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to examine significant interactions between parent‐in‐law sex and child‐in‐law sex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A series of independent samples t tests were conducted to examine several potential covariates, including the length of the child and child‐in‐law's courtship prior to engagement or marriage (Merrill, ), relationship status of the child‐in‐law (i.e., affianced or married; Cotterill, ), and the presence or absence of children/grandchildren (Fischer, ), as well as participant sex (mother‐in‐law vs. father‐in‐law) and the child‐in‐law's sex (i.e., daughter‐in‐law vs. son‐in‐law; Mikucki‐Enyart, ). In addition, given that same‐sex in‐law relationships (e.g., mother‐ and daughter‐in‐law) are purported to be more tumultuous than opposite‐sex in‐law dyads (e.g., Duvall, ; Merrill, ; Rittenour & Koenig Kellas, ), a two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to examine significant interactions between parent‐in‐law sex and child‐in‐law sex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research is needed to replicate these findings and determine the stability and potential theoretical contribution of this pattern. been given to the "dark side" of in-law relationships (e.g., Morr Serewicz & Canary, 2008;Rittenour & Koenig Kellas, 2015), but these results highlight the need to examine the "bright side" and what makes in-law relationships functional rather than dysfunctional.…”
Section: Implications For the Rtm/rtt And Mgprmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In-law relationships, although not studied as frequently as family-of-origin relationships (Bengston, 2004;Soliz & Rittenour, 2012), have been paid increasing attention by family communication scholars (e.g., Fowler & Rittenour, 2017;Mikucki-Enyart, 2011;Mikucki-Enyart, Caughlin, & Rittenour, 2015;Prentice, 2008;Prentice, 2009;Rittenour, 2012;Rittenour & Kellas, 2015;Serewicz, 2008;Serewicz & Canary, 2008;Serewicz, Hosmer, Ballard, & Griffin, 2008). In-law relationships are complex, nonvoluntary relationships characterized by a variety of positive and negative outcomes (Fischer, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%